Table of contents is missing the 6. Also, don't bother hiding the code, it's annoying to have to click them open to see what the plot or output refers to.
Technical stuff
Hmm. I'm sure we could be less casual about this.
View the first few entris for the cell metadata:
Entries, presumably. Also consider using head instead.
I have no idea what the plotReducedDim calls after the first PCA outlier plot in Section 3 are showing.
No need for a table of cell cycle gene information, I'll take your word for it. If you must show me the cell cycle genes, just give me their names. No one's going to read the table anyway, it's too wide.
It can also be useful to look at total expression levels acrsoo gene biotypes
Across?
To the best of my knowledge...
Our? It's not the royal We.
Need to split up the normalization section into subsections, it's far too long to read without any breaks.
Probably don't need to test so many k with RUVSeq. And just stick with one of the RUV methods, once you know how to do one, the rest follow. We're not writing a tutorial for RUVSeq, remember. Besides, RUVg doesn't seem to work so well, so why bother mentioning it?
Table of contents is missing the 6. Also, don't bother hiding the code, it's annoying to have to click them open to see what the plot or output refers to.
Hmm. I'm sure we could be less casual about this.
Entries, presumably. Also consider using
head
instead.I have no idea what the
plotReducedDim
calls after the first PCA outlier plot in Section 3 are showing.No need for a table of cell cycle gene information, I'll take your word for it. If you must show me the cell cycle genes, just give me their names. No one's going to read the table anyway, it's too wide.
Across?
Our? It's not the royal We.
Need to split up the normalization section into subsections, it's far too long to read without any breaks.
Probably don't need to test so many
k
with RUVSeq. And just stick with one of the RUV methods, once you know how to do one, the rest follow. We're not writing a tutorial for RUVSeq, remember. Besides, RUVg doesn't seem to work so well, so why bother mentioning it?