search

davydotcom / spud_core_admin

Spud Core Management (Site Management Gem)
0 stars 0 forks source link

License missing from gemspec #1

Open bf4 opened 11 years ago

bf4 commented 11 years ago

Some companies will only use gems with a certain license. The canonical and easy way to check is via the gemspec,

via e.g.

spec.license = 'MIT'
# or
spec.licenses = ['MIT', 'GPL-2']

Even for projects that already specify a license, including a license in your gemspec is a good practice, since it is easily discoverable there without having to check the readme or for a license file.

For example, there is a License Finder gem to help companies ensure all gems they use meet their licensing needs. This tool depends on license information being available in the gemspec. This is an important enough issue that even Bundler now generates gems with a default 'MIT' license.

If you need help choosing a license (sorry, I haven't checked your readme or looked for a license file), github has created a license picker tool.

In case you're wondering how I found you and why I made this issue, it's because I'm collecting stats on gems (I was originally looking for download data) and decided to collect license metadata,too, and make issues for gemspecs not specifying a license as a public service :).

I hope you'll consider specifying a license in your gemspec. If not, please just close the issue and let me know. In either case, I'll follow up. Thanks!

p.s. I've written a blog post about this project

davydotcom commented 11 years ago

This project has the reciprocity license good call on adding to gemspec

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 20, 2013, at 9:11 PM, Benjamin Fleischer notifications@github.com wrote:

Some companies will only use gems with a certain license. The canonical and easy way to check is via the gemspec,

via e.g.

spec.license = 'MIT'

or

spec.licenses = ['MIT', 'GPL-2'] Even for projects that already specify a license, including a license in your gemspec is a good practice, since it is easily discoverable there without having to check the readme or for a license file.

For example, there is a License Finder gem to help companies ensure all gems they use meet their licensing needs. This tool depends on license information being available in the gemspec. This is an important enough issue that even Bundler now generates gems with a default 'MIT' license.

If you need help choosing a license (sorry, I haven't checked your readme or looked for a license file), github has created a license picker tool.

In case you're wondering how I found you and why I made this issue, it's because I'm collecting stats on gems (I was originally looking for download data) and decided to collect license metadata,too, and make issues for gemspecs not specifying a license as a public service :).

I hope you'll consider specifying a license in your gemspec. If not, please just close the issue and let me know. In either case, I'll follow up. Thanks!

p.s. I've written a blog post about this project

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

bf4 commented 11 years ago

Great, thanks, my pleasure!

bf4 commented 10 years ago

I see the license is still missing in https://github.com/spud-rails/spud_core_admin/blob/master/spud_core.gemspec would you like a PR?