search

dawsbot / eth-labels

📃 A public dataset of crypto addresses labeled
https://eth-labels-production.up.railway.app/swagger
MIT License
198 stars 30 forks source link

MegaDoge.Org token and Wallet label #16

Closed saintshiba closed 9 months ago

saintshiba commented 9 months ago

To my dismay, I found this token, as well as the contract address and my wallet address to have been wrongly labelled as "fake_phishing" and "phish/hack".

I believe this to be a mistake. I find the labels to be a mis-representation of the project and of me. My own wallet address has been unfairly labeled as "fake_phishing", and I find this to be highly defamatory.

The addresses in question: URL: https://polygonscan.com/address/0xcbf4ab00b6aa19b4d5d29c7c3508b393a1c01fe3 Polygon Token Contract: 0xcbf4ab00b6aa19b4d5d29c7c3508b393a1c01fe3

URL: 0x38a5F90f91f29FcF94Db8f2d4250338330c7a4dF Wallet Address: 0x38a5F90f91f29FcF94Db8f2d4250338330c7a4dF

May I have the reports that were submitted? May I have evidence of the alleged phishing or the alleged hacking? I need this information so I can ameliorate the issue and identify the problem. I believe this claim was wrongly raised based on misconceptions about this project. Whoever labelled it may have mistaken the token distribution as a dusting attack. They may have been duped by a scammer claiming to represent the token or pretending to be me. I cannot find anything in the transaction history that would indicate a phishing attack.

This token has been around for a long time and there have been no issues. I've tried to get polygonscan to post the logo and the price, but they always ignore my requests. They blocked any further commentary on the profile page so it might seem that the project is dead or inactive. I've lost a lot of trust in polygonscan and blockscan as a result of this troubling development. I feel I can no longer trust the company to publish accurate or honest information, and this highlights an urgent need for more decentralization in block explorer technology in crypto.

Please remove the addresses from your blacklists.

dawsbot commented 9 months ago

@saintshiba this repo is a pull directly from Etherscan. Can you provide a link to the line-of-code in the repo which includes this misinformation? I see your links to Etherscan but when searching this repo I was unable to find the data you're referencing:

https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adawsbot%2Fevm-labels+0xcbf4ab00b6aa19b4d5d29c7c3508b393a1c01fe3&type=code

dawsbot commented 9 months ago

Feel free to re-open if you can provide those links as my case-insensitive address searches came up empty @saintshiba

saintshiba commented 8 months ago

Here is the token page with the bad labels: 1. https://polygonscan.com/token/0xcbf4ab00b6aa19b4d5d29c7c3508b393a1c01fe3 Here is the link for the wallet I gave you already with the bad labels: 2. https://polygonscan.com/address/0x38a5F90f91f29FcF94Db8f2d4250338330c7a4dF

Where can I find the source from where you pulled it from? Do you have the github link or url?

dawsbot commented 8 months ago

@saintshiba what I mean is that I don't see either of these eth addresses in this repo codebase. Are you saying that this repo has these addresses mis-categorized?