Lucky Find has Criminal Influence

[ArchmageBB]

Lucky Find has Criminal Influence when it should have none.

[SleepyBrett]

It should have influence.

On Apr 13, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Aaron Kingery notifications@github.com wrote:

Lucky Find has Criminal Influence when it should have none.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[db0]

I think they mean it has crim influence when it should have neutral influence.

[SleepyBrett]

I'm just checking through the code (events.py.. line 102) ...

      if num(card.Influence) and card.Faction != Identity.Faction:
     if Identity.model == 'bc0f047c-01b1-427f-a439-d451eda03029' and card.Type == 'Program' and card.model not in professorsRig:
        debugNotify("adding {} to prof. rig. card type = {}".format(card,card.Type))
        professorsRig.append(card.model) # First instance of a card is free of influence costs.
     else: 
        debugNotify("adding influence of {}. card type = {}".format(card,card.Type))
        loInf += num(card.Influence)

And from the set:

<card id="bc0f047c-01b1-427f-a439-d451eda04109" name="Lucky Find">
...
  <property name="Faction" value="Neutral" />
  <property name="Influence" value="2" />
...
</card>

I'm not in a position to test it, but assuming it makes it down to the influence counting subroutine I can't see why it wouldn't be counted properly. If you identity is Criminal then card.faction != identity.faction, and we're not professor and it's not a program, count the influence.

Can the OP provide a test case?

[db0]

Huh, if it's set as Neutral in the xml then yeah it shouldn't be a problem.

[ArchmageBB]

I believe you are correct. Thank you for your effort. It is really a card image problem and not database/game play.

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Divided by Zer0 notifications@github.comwrote:

Huh, if it's set as Neutral in the xml then yeah it shouldn't be a problem.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/db0/Android-Netrunner-OCTGN/issues/424#issuecomment-40385110 .