Work out the provenance for MP and NP

[rkboyce]

The MP graphs have no provenance right now - we need to discuss what that will be. This should be done with consideration of prov on the nanopublications

[jodischneider]

See http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/

[jodischneider]

Questions:

• The pubInfo and provenance are both generated at the same time and with the same author. BUT one is for the nanopublication and one is for the assertion. -- AUTHOR: Should the DIKB itself (software agent) be considered the author of anything? -- TIME: Should the timestamps be the same? The NP assertion is generated in advance. Should we make the provenance of the NP assertion at creation time? Or does it make sense to only assign provenance when we "believe" the assertion [i.e. "assert" is a "commitment" asserted by some agent A]
• How should we handle belief criteria? -- Currently we add the evidence conditions UNDER WHICH the NP assertion holds. We model these with prov:hadMember (http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/#hadMember )

ddi:ddi-spl-annotation-np-provenance-298 = { ddi:ddi-spl-annotation-np-assertion-298 prov:generatedAtTime "2015-08-04T15:20:41.337012"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:hadMember dikbEvidence:EV_PK_DDI_NR, dikbEvidence:EV_PK_DDI_Par_Grps, dikbEvidence:EV_PK_DDI_RCT ; prov:wasAttributedTo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-2085 ; prov:wasDerivedFrom "Derived from the DIKB's evidence base using the listed belief criteria" . }

ddi:ddi-spl-annotation-np-pubInfo-298 = { ddi:ddi-spl-annotation-nanopub-298 prov:generatedAtTime "2015-08-04T15:20:41.336891"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-2085 . }

[jodischneider]

Jodi to investigate "derived" in PROV, example http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/#qualifiedDerivation