search

dbmi-pitt / DIKB-Micropublication

Micropublication and Open Data Annotation for drug-drug interaction evidence synthesis
Apache License 2.0
7 stars 1 forks source link

Claim is already a Statement #4

Closed jodischneider closed 9 years ago

jodischneider commented 10 years ago

It's not wrong, but not necessary, to assert that

s rdf:type Claim s rdf:type Statement

Claims are always Statements. So just use s rdf:type Claim

samuelrosko commented 9 years ago

This is not longer the case, but what is the case now is:

        graph.add((poc[currentAnnotationClaim],RDF.type, mp["Claim"]))
        graph.add((poc[currentAnnotationClaim],RDF.type, mp["Representation"]))

Does this make sense to you? It does not to me... If you look at the MP paper, it says:

f. A Representation is an Artifact which represents something.

g. A Representation may be a Sentence, Data, Method, Micropublication, Attribution, or ArticleText.

So that should be removed and it should just be a claim, correct?

jodischneider commented 9 years ago

TODO: Remove graph.add((poc[currentAnnotationClaim],RDF.type, mp["Representation"])) -- we will get this from the inferencing (using MP OWL file).

samuelrosko commented 9 years ago

Yifan implemented this change at roughly 4PM on 2015-07-29.