During the IEEE WIFS workshop I got a review of our work by Carmela Troncoso. One comment worth mentioning was "You submit this to PETS in February, they'll love it".
The main comments she had that we should not forget to address are:
Analyse whether a social graph can be constructed from either communication or proof shares. Proof shares should be fine, since they are unlinkable. But the communication might actually reveal this, e.g. a witness uploads NIZK proofs for all witnessed proof shares.
Emphasize the assumption about honest majority and setting a threshold larger than the size of any possible group of colluders.
We've planned to do these, but these were the two main points she would consider as a reviewer.
dbosk
commented
6 years ago
During the IEEE WIFS workshop I got a review of our work by Carmela Troncoso. One comment worth mentioning was "You submit this to PETS in February, they'll love it".
The main comments she had that we should not forget to address are:
We've planned to do these, but these were the two main points she would consider as a reviewer.