map extracted citations to some bibliographic ontology

[VladimirAlexiev]

http://downloads.dbpedia.org/preview.php?file=2015-10_sl_core-i18n_sl_en_sl_citation_data_en.ttl.bz2 shows bibliographic data using raw (dbp:) properties.

Just out of this first page I see: accessdate archivedate archiveurl author date doi edition editorFirst editorLast encyclopedia first first1 first2 isbn issue journal jstor last last1 last2 location pages publisher ref title url volume website work year

We need to structure this (eg first1,last1 are the first&last names of the first author). And map it to dbo: props, or to some bibliographic ontology (BIBO?)

Tasks:

• get a complete list of fields, with some interpretation (eg is location same as pages or not?). Guess we get them from Wikipedia template documentation: cite web, cite book, what other templates?
• decide what ontology to map them to. What's your opinion?

[VladimirAlexiev]

We should also decide how to link the reference to the article.

• currently in http://downloads.dbpedia.org/preview.php?file=2015-10_sl_core-i18n_sl_en_sl_citation_links_en.ttl.bz2:

<ref> dbp:isCitedBy <article>

• do we link the article (eg wiki:Sofia) or the thing (eg dbr:Sofia)? Eg

dbr:Sofia crm:P70i_is_documented_in <ref>.
wiki:Sofia dct:source <ref> 

[paregorios]

+1 BIBO

[GerardKuys]

Bibo is fine, but I would recommend to have a look at BibFrame, too (http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/ ). Having just the bf:Work and maybe one of its bf:Instance(s) (editions) might be just good enough to get the bibliographic info in

[mroszkowski]

I think BIBO is both simple and flexible enough to cover basic bibliographic data elements. However BIBFRAME is noteworthy. Unfortunately I can't see any ready to use BIBFRAME instance type specification.

+1 BIBO