Open mxmehl opened 1 year ago
I wonder what the summary for a multi-repo check should look like. Wouldn't it be better to just print all reports as a list of dicts, and also wrap the output for a single repo in a list? This way, it could easily be analysed by subsequent steps or tools.
For a summary I would expect a report like this:
Repository | Number of ORG contributors | Total ORG contributions | Latest contribution |
---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/example/one | 3 | 47 | 2023-08-01 |
https://github.com/example/two | 1 | 2 | 2018-12-24 (more than a year ago) |
https://github.com/example/three | 0 | 0 | no contributions |
Where "ORG" would be a label or title for the specific contributions the checker filtered for.
I would maybe also like to see some additional fields such as "percentage of ORG contributions" or "average ORG activity per week" or "average total activity per week".
To get a better overview about a set of repositories we need a way to specify multiple repositories. I would suggest an option
-f
,--file
, which takes the name of a configuration file which contains all the information needed to do the analysis. This would be the expression for filtering by author email and a list of repository URLs.To make this efficient, we might want to cache repositories at a defined location, so that the tool only transfers the minimal amount of data and doesn't check out all repositories from scratch with every invocation (see #4).
The report should then show a summary instead of the results for an individual repository.