Closed modellstadt closed 5 years ago
can it not crash anymore? i think the dijkstra implementation in my colab example notebook should be robust...
On 20 Mar 2019, at 07:39, modellstadt notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
Closed #7https://github.com/dbt-ethz/mola/issues/7.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/dbt-ethz/mola/issues/7#event-2215835801, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA1-2S3MmIDmS4uDqVjTs6rwefi9Ix-ks5vYdeSgaJpZM4b5fAE.
yes, it cannot crash anymore.. the important aspect is just, if I understand it right, that the end condition (in this -1 as precedent node) is guaranteed if a node was not reached
On Mar 20, 2019, at 8:39 AM, Mathias Bernhard notifications@github.com wrote:
can it not crash anymore? i think the dijkstra implementation in my colab example notebook should be robust...
On 20 Mar 2019, at 07:39, modellstadt notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
Closed #7https://github.com/dbt-ethz/mola/issues/7.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/dbt-ethz/mola/issues/7#event-2215835801, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA1-2S3MmIDmS4uDqVjTs6rwefi9Ix-ks5vYdeSgaJpZM4b5fAE.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dbt-ethz/mola/issues/7#issuecomment-474720043, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALBZgBvq8aJ4sRnQN65Q8L-WNi0PFCDmks5vYeWrgaJpZM4b5fAE.
no solution for absolute unreachable path