Closed graciegoheen closed 1 year ago
Hi Grace, when you do this, do you mind linking to https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/discussions/8307? as we have done in previous upgrade guides? Something like the below?
For maintainers of adapter plugins
For more detailed information and to ask questions, please read and comment on the GH discussion: dbt-labs/dbt-core#8307.
The manifest schema version has been updated to v11. Specific changes:
@dbeatty10 do you know what the manifest schema changes were? The PR that bumped the version didn't seem to make any other changes.
The run_results schema version has been updated to v5. Specific changes:
compiled
, compiled_code
, relation_name
)The nodes dictionary in the catalog.json
can now be "partial" if dbt docs generate
is run with a selector.
--select
to generate documentation for a subset of your projectloaded_at_field
, dbt will try to determine freshness from warehouse metadata tablesloaded_at_field
create_metric: true
label
in semantic_models, measures, dimensions and
entitiesfill_nulls_with
and join_to_timespine
for metric nodessaved_queries
extend governance beyond the semantic objects to their consumptiondelimiter
for a seed fileaccess
as a configdate_spine
macro from dbt-utils to dbt-coreOutstanding:
Behavior change:
Full information here -> https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/issues/8704#issuecomment-1753905285
Previously -> "the loaded_at_field is required to calculate freshness for a table. If a loaded_at_field is not provided, then dbt will not calculate freshness for the table."
In 1.7 -> when you add a freshness: config to a source (and no loaded_at_field is provided), we will calculate freshness for that source via warehouse metadata tables when the warehouse supports it
@graciegoheen here's a 1.7 adapter upgrade guide snippet about dbt show. My brain feels as though it's something worth calling out in the end user 1.7 guide, but perhaps not because this change just happened for all users of 1.5 and 1.6 as well? Do we this new behavior called out? Ok for the answer to be no, provided that we only ever rever to the new behavior. That said, I don't see any reference in the doc for dbt show that mentions this new behavior
That said, I don't see any reference in the doc for dbt show that mentions this new behavior
@dataders I just opened an issue for this here: https://github.com/dbt-labs/docs.getdbt.com/issues/4256
I don't know the way you want to update the docs for show
, so I'm relying on you to update this docs issue as-needed.
Contributions
Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates
https://docs.getdbt.com/guides/migration/versions/upgrading-to-v1.7
What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?
We need to update this for what's going to be released in 1.7
Additional information
@graciegoheen -> to add what content needs to go onto this page