Closed alittlesliceoftom closed 3 years ago
Surrogate key passes tests from this change.
What do you think @swanderz
@jkock what do you think?
From a SQL database optimization point of view, this seems to be overdoing it. But on the other hand is it also a bad optimization to need to rewrite all macro's for SQL server because of this little issue.
So, I guess this would be OK
@jkock if you notice performance issues then we could consider reducing length or reverting to the many rewrites at a later date, but agger with @swanderz merging this until those performance issues are raised as an actual issue by a user in practice. :)
allowed whilst still enabling indexes. Maybe a tiny bit less performant than default (30) but much more flexible.
This is a competing PR to #14 .
Hopefully it enables the same functionality gain with less code.