Closed HughP closed 1 year ago
Hi @HughP,
Sorry for not responding earlier.
Specifically, following the principles of linked data, when dereferenced, these DC term URI:s should resolve to a document in a machine-readable RDF format if you ask for such a format (i.e. using content negotiation), so a system can know what the URI means.
Example of content negotiation:
$ curl -s -L -H "Accept: text/turtle" http://purl.org/dc/terms/
(Closing as not-an-issue. Feel free to re-open if you have found a formal reference to the non-working xsd URL.)
Greetings,
Can someone please help me better understand the implementation facts around the DCMI namespaces? I mean the following:
I work with XML/OAI-PMH protocols quite a bit and my understanding is that we set the header in documents to define the namespaces used within the document but these namespaces point out to a resolvable machine readable location for each term. For example, via an
.xsd
file, which can be used for validation.My confusion comes to the point where http://purl.org/dc/terms/ points to documentation for the schema but the .xsd is not reachable at http://purl.org/dc/terms/dcterms.xsd rather the xsd is only available here: https://www.dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd
So my questions are:
xsd
file not hosted in the path of the namespace?Any help to better understand the hosing situation and the application of technologies is appreciated.