Open tombaker opened 4 years ago
Do the dc11's have ranges? If not, they can't be equivalent, right?
Change to comment +1
Do the dc11's have ranges? If not, they can't be equivalent, right?
They do not have ranges per se, but "range includes". As I see it, declaring them as equivalent would not result in any data becoming inconsistent.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:35 PM Karen Coyle notifications@github.com wrote:
Do the dc11's have ranges? If not, they can't be equivalent, right?
Change to comment +1
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcmi/usage/issues/88?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIOBJQDRBCN5MDFSS43JITQ55QOPA5CNFSM4KHBQXVKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJBRAMI#issuecomment-574820401, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIOBJRMWPPREVWNN6B2QFLQ55QOPANCNFSM4KHBQXVA .
In the current version none of them has "Has range". I can't remember where the ISO version is, but it looks to me like the 1.1 terms do not have ranges. I also think that is how it should be.
EDITED
dc11:format (through 2019)
Comment reads: "Examples of dimensions include size and duration. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as the list of Internet Media Types."
dcterms:format (ISO 15836-2 / DCMIMT 2020)
Comment reads: "Recommended practice is to use a controlled vocabulary where available. For example, for file formats one could use the list of Internet Media Types. Examples of dimensions include size and duration."
range_includes:
Examples
text/xml
https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mvidformat/dvd
23 cm
CHANGING NOW (unless I hear objections!)
dc11:format (DCMIMT 2020)
No changes.
PROPOSING FOR FUTURE (to be voted)
dc11:format
Declare equivalent to dcterms: Add to comment: "Examples of dimensions include size and duration." (as per dcterms:)