dcmi / usage

DCMI Usage Board - meeting record and decisions
8 stars 5 forks source link

dc/dcterms: format #88

Open tombaker opened 4 years ago

tombaker commented 4 years ago

EDITED

CHANGING NOW (unless I hear objections!)

PROPOSING FOR FUTURE (to be voted)

kcoyle commented 4 years ago

Do the dc11's have ranges? If not, they can't be equivalent, right?

Change to comment +1

tombaker commented 4 years ago

Do the dc11's have ranges? If not, they can't be equivalent, right?

They do not have ranges per se, but "range includes". As I see it, declaring them as equivalent would not result in any data becoming inconsistent.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:35 PM Karen Coyle notifications@github.com wrote:

Do the dc11's have ranges? If not, they can't be equivalent, right?

Change to comment +1

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcmi/usage/issues/88?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIOBJQDRBCN5MDFSS43JITQ55QOPA5CNFSM4KHBQXVKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJBRAMI#issuecomment-574820401, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIOBJRMWPPREVWNN6B2QFLQ55QOPANCNFSM4KHBQXVA .

kcoyle commented 4 years ago

In the current version none of them has "Has range". I can't remember where the ISO version is, but it looks to me like the 1.1 terms do not have ranges. I also think that is how it should be.