in the original DCO items a developer certifies are numerated as
(a) (b) (c) (d)
in probot's reformatted for readability version numeration has changed to 1. 2. 3. 4.
the problem arises under 3. where the reformatting wasn't pulled through.
it reads:
The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
(a), (b) or (c) actually refers to 1. 2. 3.
best solution for legal consistency: stick with (a) (b) (c) (d) numeration of the original DCO
in the original DCO items a developer certifies are numerated as (a) (b) (c) (d) in probot's reformatted for readability version numeration has changed to 1. 2. 3. 4. the problem arises under 3. where the reformatting wasn't pulled through. it reads: