dcorking / google-wave-resources

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources
0 stars 0 forks source link

Feature Request: Pass UserID to robots #242

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
As far as I can tell (from incoming data logs, searching Wave, the sandbox, 
and the issue tracker) there's no way for a robot to make an automatic 
connection between some_email@gmail.com and some_email@googlewave.com. 

My problem is that I want to pull user content from my app into Wave to be 
managed/collaborated on, but I'd much rather let Google handle my auth than 
require users to set a Wave password or manually tie their Wave account to 
their app account.

Of course, I'm assuming that the unique Google Accounts IDs apply to 
@googlewave.com addresses, and that in the future addresses won't use 
@gmail.com addresses.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by pakattac...@gmail.com on 3 Oct 2009 at 1:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
You will have to have the users authenticate to other Google services either 
way - even 
if you know their Gmail account - probably by redirecting them to an 
authentication 
screen (AuthSub). Does knowing the GMail account make that authentication 
easier?

Original comment by pamela.fox on 6 Oct 2009 at 2:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I'm not sure why (or how) users logged into Wave would need to authenticate 
again. 
Especially since the robot doesn't seem to be able to make the connection 
between a 
Wave user who submitted a blip and that same user logged into my App Engine app.

With that said, thinking about now, as not every Google Account has a GMail 
account 
having a gmail address wouldn't solve the problem of loading content tied to 
that 
account. A better title for the issue might be "Enable robots to automatically 
link 
Wave users to Google Accounts"

At this point I'm not sure if my thinking is to narrow/naive (i.e. non App 
Engine 
robots would have no use for a user ID), so I'll make a thread in the 
discussion 
group rather than clutter the comments here.

Original comment by pakattac...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 4:55