Closed folofjc closed 3 years ago
Ugh, my fault. I was used shorthands
(out of habit) and not abbreviations
. Just looked at the .tex
file of the documentation and saw the correct way to do it.
Yep. I noted in my comment on your other issue that in the next version, I'm going to move away from the shorttitle
/shorthand
combination on the grounds that it's excessively confusing.
Interestingly, there appears to be an error in SBLHS2 for hte case of GKC. On page 189 where it is listing abbreviations by Source, GKC is not italicized. But on pg 234 where it is listing them by Abbreviation, it is italicized. I think it is wrong on pg 234. Since GKC is an abbreviation for the editors and translator, I think it should not be italicized.
Per the
biblatex-sbl
document page 15 undershorthand
, it states that if bothshorthand
andshorttitle
are the same, then it assumes thatshorthand
is short for the title and therefore should be italicized. This works in footnotes, but not in the list of abbreviations. Here is a MWE:See SBLHS2 page 255 for TDOT showing that in a list of abbreviations it should still be italicized.
I don't know what a general rule should be, but I think if it is italicized in the footnote, then it should be italicized in the list of abbreviations.