dcpurton / biblatex-sbl

Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) style files for biblatex
24 stars 5 forks source link

sbl-paper as package? #38

Closed ghost closed 7 years ago

ghost commented 8 years ago

Thanks for putting together the sample paper!

Any way this can become a separate package as a .cls?

dcpurton commented 8 years ago

I'm considering this.

My hesitation is what makes most sense for biblatex-sbl

A related question is how much do I put into the .sty file?

Nhapsie commented 8 years ago

I think .sty files or modules would offer more flexible options to be incorporated into or called from one's particular .cls. To give an example, biblical languages is a must in many cases except for systematic theology. In this case an .sty for biblical languages makes sense. In the preamble of the .sty you would place the information about xelatex. Whatever extra we do here must be left as optional.

Or, make the best of two worlds. Build a .cls with everything out of the box for beginners, and separate .sty modules for those who use their own .cls

The idea of using the git wiki is good. Many universities have their own guidelines for page format, and could post them here as a repository

ghost commented 8 years ago

My university uses the Student Supplement as is (thus my interest).

SBTS — a local seminary — uses Turabian as primary, SBL for abbreviations and for specific issues that Turabian doesn't address. I'm not sure how much benefit this package would be for them. Would almost need to start with Turabian or Chicago and work from there. Their journal citations, for example, are:

Dozeman, Thomas B. “Inner-Biblical Interpretation of Yahweh’s Gracious and Compassionate Character.” Journal of Biblical Literature 108, no. 2 (1989): 207– 23.

It wouldn't be terribly hard to modify the sbl-paper on a case-by-case basis for unique uses.

An included .sty or .cls file would be easiest, I think. But you could perhaps make it separate from biblatex-sbl and even allow for one's own biblatex style, but again, the occasions when someone would need sbl-paper without biblatex-sbl seem rare.

Greek/Heb support is a must. Could be a separate file, though, if needed.

Nhapsie commented 8 years ago

Clark! I visited your Git and it looks great, nice to know you're maintaining Fischer's. In fact, I produced the same stuff basically. Check out my template, under construction as well. I am following the head titles for my university, this is basically the only difference. [https://www.dropbox.com/s/av953su72xqjh5i/autemplate.pdf?dl=0]

ghost commented 8 years ago

Thanks @Nhapsie ! Is your's intended for a thesis/dissertation or some school-specific stuff?

Nhapsie commented 8 years ago

I just uploaded some corrections. Yes, it's intended for thesis, but also for other uses like teaching in the near future

dcpurton commented 8 years ago

Check out the latest dev branch for sbl-paper.sty. sbl-paper.tex now shows how to use the package. Greek and Hebrew are also supported.

Note: There is an incompatibility between the bidi package and biblatex that means that it is not possible to track footnote citations separately from body citations. This is probably not a show stopper bug. It will potentially appear if you are using idem or ibid and interspersing \parencite and \autocite citations.

Nhapsie commented 8 years ago

I see, thanks for the info. We don't use \parencite in our seminary just one system of tracking, but for others this is good to know. The inclusion of new example for single volume dictionary in 6.3.6.2 of biblatex-sbl-test.pdf looks great.

The latest dev branc has good addition to sbl-paper.tex. Just one thing: omit "when a word processor such as Microsoft Word..."

dcpurton commented 7 years ago

fixed in v0.7