Closed lyndondrake closed 7 years ago
Your bibentry for Joosten:1998a has options={useprefix=true}
. This causes biblatex
to see it as a different author even though there actually is no prefix in the name.
Ah OK. After messing around with it I've figured out that it comes from Zotero, which adds the tag because of the editor's name. Thanks for the prompt response.
Interesting. SBL requires names like de Moor to be sorted under Moor. So the useprefix
option is actually wrong here anyway. It does, however, sort names like John Van Seters under Van Seters. See SBLHS §7.2.2.2 for details on sorting names with a prefix (basically, it seems to depend on whether the prefix is capitalised or not).
I can't think of a real world situation where you'd care about whether a secondary editor (or translator, etc.) needed to control the prefix, because I doubt you'd want to index them and they aren't sorted by that field in the bibliography. Even then useprefix
is able to be set on a per-namelist scope, so you might be able to do some kind of magic with a source map.
I would try and disable zotero
from automatically setting this option, since it won't correctly pick the primary name field in every case no matter how clever it tries to be.
Annoyingly, it's not a field zotero
exposes in the UI, but it does set it on export. It might well do so with the records it supplies to citeproc.js
for its own document formatting too, but I haven't checked.
I can probably do something with the BetterBibTex plugin to override it, but for the moment, I've just (incorrectly) changed the editor field and put the prefix in the first name field. And yep, I knew that from the SBL style guide (which I'm becoming depressingly well-acquainted with, though no doubt not as well as you are!). It's one of the less-sensible parts of the guide, IMO, and perhaps reflects a North American viewpoint on European surnames? But there's no point me arguing with the style guide - "ours is not to reason why etc." :-)
I'm trying to produce an author index, which is mostly working fine. But I get one duplicate:
Here are the relevant
.bib
entries:By checking the page numbers, I can tell that it is the last of these that produces the duplicate. But Ican't for the life of me figure out what's different about the author name.
In the bibliography itself, the name is correctly recognised: