Closed jackweinbender closed 7 years ago
Aside: biblatex-sbl
does not use biblatex-chicago
. It's an independent style built straight on top of biblatex
. So any upstream changes should go directly to biblatex
.
OK, now for the question.
There is no neat solution to this. series
and number
are defined as fields in biblatex
and to change the definition to lists would break every style out there, so this isn't going to happen upstream. I could do it just for biblatex-sbl
, but it would be quite a pain and involve changing and adding a lot of code.
Adding extra fields like extraseries
, extrashortseries
and extranumber
which are defined as lists might be another potential way forward, but I'm not really sure that this is that much neater than the work around that I present below. And it would be quite a pain to code, so I'm not that inclined to do it… :)
Even the example of multiple publishers that you give is not supported out of the box with biblatex
. I had to write custom macros that looped through the publisher
and location
lists, printing one at a time and dealing with cases where the number of publishers and locations didn't match in a sensible way.
However, all is not lost. Here's a better work around than what you have and what is offered on Stack Exchange. It makes use of the note
field and a special biblatex-sbl
citation command to cite the series (\citeseries{}
). It correctly handles the List of Abbreviations and hyperref
. It does require and extra run of biber
and LaTeX
since the series citation is embedded in the main citation.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[style=sbl]{biblatex}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@book{falk2007,
author = {Falk, Daniel K.},
booktitle = {The Parabiblical Texts: Strategies for Extending the Scriptures among the Dead Sea Scrolls},
date = {2007},
note = {\citeseries{CQS} 8; \citeseries{LSTS} 63},
shorttitle = {The Parabiblical Texts},
title = {The Parabiblical Texts: Strategies for Extending the Scriptures among the Dead Sea Scrolls},
location = {Edinburgh},
publisher = {T\&T Clark}
}
@series{CQS,
series = {Companion to the Qumran Scrolls},
shortseries = {CQS},
options = {skipbib}
}
@series{LSTS,
series = {Library of Second Temple Studies},
shortseries = {LTST},
options = {skipbib}
}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\null\vfill
Filler text \autocite[20]{falk2007}.
Filler text \autocite[30]{falk2007}.
\printbiblist{abbreviations}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
A further thought. Changing series
to a list is a bad idea because any series with and in it would then need braces around it. Since series
is normally a field this would be very unexpected behaviour and break existing entries in a confusing way.
If you think this is an acceptable solution, perhaps it's worth adding such an example to biblatex-sbl-examples.pdf
I think this is pretty workable, thanks.
On a related matter, you may have noticed, I've been using the xdata
type to try to DRY-up series and publishers. It would be awesome if \citeseries
could reference xdata
types, but as of right now, it seems that it can't. It's no big deal, I've come up with an OK solution:
@xdata{series_cqs,
series = {Companion to the Qumran Scrolls},
shortseries = {CQS},
}
@series{cqs,
options = {skipbib=1},
xdata = {series_cqs},
}
I only have to do this with the series I plan to reference, so it's NBD, but being able to use xdata
seems like it could be useful.
Thanks for all your hard work on this---it's really great to have such a well developed and maintained package for SBL citations.
@xdata entry types cannot be cited. By design (in biblatex
and biber
) they are purely data containers.
To account for different punctuation, the note should be:
note = {\citeseries{CQS} 8\ifbibliography{\addsemicolon}{\addcomma} \citeseries{LSTS} 63}
See https://sblhs2.com/2017/03/02/separating-multiple-series/
This may be an issue/feature better treated up the chain in
biblatex-chicago
, but I've run into this problem a few times now, and it seems common enough that we should have a good solution for it.On occasion, books are a part of multiple series and up to this point I've been content to just forego the
number
field and just write-out the series and numbers as literals in theseries
andshortseries
fields, like so:It's not ideal, but, I don't generally use an abbreviations section for papers, so it's never been an issue. However, for my dissertation I need one, and this, obviously, causes a problem for the auto-generated abbreviations list (which is awesome, BTW):
All I've been able to find is this SO question, which is pretty much just offers a few variations of what I do. So, have I missed something? Is there a canonical way to do this? It occurs to me that, for instance, we have the ability to make compound publisher/location entries, which, typologically should be similar to the series/number relationship:
So, I'd like to be able to do this:
How feasable would it be to implement this, or, again, does it make more sense to make the suggestion for
biblatex-chicago
?