banner anim

[dcsan]

spent far too long fucking around with this but here's a banner anim since i don't have cut out parts its just a call / frame animation, not real movement.

i don't really have the tools / time to make another real animation atm

[dcsan]

not happy with this but... if you do want to change the frames, please modify in

/bureau/marcom/banner01/

files are in /1000/

there's a script there need to convert them to 'wide' eg 16:9 ratio so i make 888x500 and crop off on each side

then make the mp4

there's a script in there process.sh that does it all

[intellikat]

Yeah let’s not use this. We should not be putting out content where our feeling about it is “I’m not happy with it but I spent too long on it so I feel we should use it.”

There’s a lot of artwork I’ve done for the project we haven’t and aren’t using. It’s okay to just let it go of that work if it’s not consistent with the quality of the whole.

I sent a transparent layer of the creature previously. Is that used in this? The speed is too slow for the kind of flickering or “on” effect.

I’ll take a look at the elements and scripting but if it doesn’t work then let’s just use a still. This kind of thing can always be done later... if there is a later. Better to focus on the things that will potentially build a later.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:52 AM dc notifications@github.com wrote:

not happy with this but... if you do want to change the frames, please modify in

/bureau/marcom/banner01/

files are in /1000/

there's a script there need to convert them to 'wide' eg 16:9 ratio so i make 888x500 and crop off on each side

then make the mp4

there's a script in there process.sh that does it all

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcsan/storydata/issues/30#issuecomment-727053148, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXLMT54GMMYRTTEZJOQZBDSPWTCVANCNFSM4TVBLEHA .

[intellikat]

This is pretty decent for the concept. 3:2, 800px x 531px, less than 1MB in size.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:50 AM John Knauss john.knauss@gmail.com wrote:

Yeah let’s not use this. We should not be putting out content where our feeling about it is “I’m not happy with it but I spent too long on it so I feel we should use it.”

There’s a lot of artwork I’ve done for the project we haven’t and aren’t using. It’s okay to just let it go of that work if it’s not consistent with the quality of the whole.

I sent a transparent layer of the creature previously. Is that used in this? The speed is too slow for the kind of flickering or “on” effect.

I’ll take a look at the elements and scripting but if it doesn’t work then let’s just use a still. This kind of thing can always be done later... if there is a later. Better to focus on the things that will potentially build a later.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:52 AM dc notifications@github.com wrote:

not happy with this but... if you do want to change the frames, please modify in

/bureau/marcom/banner01/

files are in /1000/

there's a script there need to convert them to 'wide' eg 16:9 ratio so i make 888x500 and crop off on each side

then make the mp4

there's a script in there process.sh that does it all

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcsan/storydata/issues/30#issuecomment-727053148, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXLMT54GMMYRTTEZJOQZBDSPWTCVANCNFSM4TVBLEHA .

[intellikat]

Format: GIFDimensions: 800w x 533hSize: 798.9KSettings: Selective, 256 Colors, 100% Diffusion Dither, 13 frames, Transparency on, No Transparency Dither, Non-Interlaced, 0% Web Snap

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 1:10 PM John Knauss john.knauss@gmail.com wrote:

This is pretty decent for the concept. 3:2, 800px x 531px, less than 1MB in size.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:50 AM John Knauss john.knauss@gmail.com wrote:

Yeah let’s not use this. We should not be putting out content where our feeling about it is “I’m not happy with it but I spent too long on it so I feel we should use it.”

There’s a lot of artwork I’ve done for the project we haven’t and aren’t using. It’s okay to just let it go of that work if it’s not consistent with the quality of the whole.

I sent a transparent layer of the creature previously. Is that used in this? The speed is too slow for the kind of flickering or “on” effect.

I’ll take a look at the elements and scripting but if it doesn’t work then let’s just use a still. This kind of thing can always be done later... if there is a later. Better to focus on the things that will potentially build a later.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:52 AM dc notifications@github.com wrote:

not happy with this but... if you do want to change the frames, please modify in

/bureau/marcom/banner01/

files are in /1000/

there's a script there need to convert them to 'wide' eg 16:9 ratio so i make 888x500 and crop off on each side

then make the mp4

there's a script in there process.sh that does it all

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcsan/storydata/issues/30#issuecomment-727053148, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXLMT54GMMYRTTEZJOQZBDSPWTCVANCNFSM4TVBLEHA .

[intellikat]

[image: bpo-creature-promo.gif]

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 1:39 PM John Knauss john.knauss@gmail.com wrote:

Format: GIFDimensions: 800w x 533hSize: 798.9KSettings: Selective, 256 Colors, 100% Diffusion Dither, 13 frames, Transparency on, No Transparency Dither, Non-Interlaced, 0% Web Snap

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 1:10 PM John Knauss john.knauss@gmail.com wrote:

This is pretty decent for the concept. 3:2, 800px x 531px, less than 1MB in size.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:50 AM John Knauss john.knauss@gmail.com wrote:

Yeah let’s not use this. We should not be putting out content where our feeling about it is “I’m not happy with it but I spent too long on it so I feel we should use it.”

There’s a lot of artwork I’ve done for the project we haven’t and aren’t using. It’s okay to just let it go of that work if it’s not consistent with the quality of the whole.

I sent a transparent layer of the creature previously. Is that used in this? The speed is too slow for the kind of flickering or “on” effect.

I’ll take a look at the elements and scripting but if it doesn’t work then let’s just use a still. This kind of thing can always be done later... if there is a later. Better to focus on the things that will potentially build a later.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:52 AM dc notifications@github.com wrote:

not happy with this but... if you do want to change the frames, please modify in

/bureau/marcom/banner01/

files are in /1000/

there's a script there need to convert them to 'wide' eg 16:9 ratio so i make 888x500 and crop off on each side

then make the mp4

there's a script in there process.sh that does it all

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcsan/storydata/issues/30#issuecomment-727053148, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXLMT54GMMYRTTEZJOQZBDSPWTCVANCNFSM4TVBLEHA .

[dcsan]

I think maybe you email replied and github didn't pick up the image.

i just see this:

can you login and just paste it into the issue?

[dcsan]

This is pretty decent for the concept. 3:2, 800px x 531px, less than 1MB

it would need to be powers of 2 so

# 4:3
# 320:420
# 400:300

# 16:9 -
# 640:360
# 960:540
# 1280:720

[intellikat]

Well, that's why I needed the dimensions before I made it. I based it on the 3:2 you said:

"eventually the frame for ads i drop into other chats would be like "old tv" size i think like 3:2 wide. not quite widescreen."

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:47 PM dc notifications@github.com wrote:

This is pretty decent for the concept. 3:2, 800px x 531px, less than 1MB

it would need to be powers of 2 so

4:3

320:420

400:300

16:9 -

640:360

960:540

1280:720

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcsan/storydata/issues/30#issuecomment-727156274, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXLMT3JHE6XKN42TYJZML3SPYRY5ANCNFSM4TVBLEHA .

[dcsan]

i meant 4:3 not 3:2 but it has to be pixel exact, the images you sent were all a bit different i did normalize them in the 960w/ directory

[intellikat]

If I know better what I'm designing from the beginning it can be consistent.I'm just trying to knock something together now with what time I have.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 3:12 PM dc notifications@github.com wrote:

i meant 4:3 not 3:2 but it has to be pixel exact, the images you sent were all a bit different i did normalize them in the 960w/ directory

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dcsan/storydata/issues/30#issuecomment-727158496, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXLMT524UZP4EFPK3Y6PTDSPYUXNANCNFSM4TVBLEHA .