search

ddalthorp / GenEst

R package development for a generalized mortality estimator
Other
6 stars 6 forks source link

Trial N for CP and SE results tables #601

Closed mhuso closed 6 years ago

mhuso commented 6 years ago

Old issue, not sure it was resolved. Please add column for number of trial carcasses in each row of the output table for SE and CP results.

ddalthorp commented 6 years ago

Yes. Resolved in latest.

mhuso commented 6 years ago

Great… thanks!

From: ddalthorp notifications@github.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 3:49 PM To: ddalthorp/GenEst GenEst@noreply.github.com Cc: Manuela Huso mhuso@usgs.gov; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ddalthorp/GenEst] Trial N for CP and SE results tables (#601)

Yes. Resolved in latest.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ddalthorp/GenEst/issues/601#issuecomment-428003735, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcwzA0xZbj0Abj9DEZV8gVgRwQljK4H_ks5ui9Z2gaJpZM4XNyW- .[image: Image removed by sender.]

mhuso commented 6 years ago

Can we add N observed in split tables too?

From: ddalthorp notifications@github.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 3:49 PM To: ddalthorp/GenEst GenEst@noreply.github.com Cc: Manuela Huso mhuso@usgs.gov; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ddalthorp/GenEst] Trial N for CP and SE results tables (#601)

Yes. Resolved in latest.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ddalthorp/GenEst/issues/601#issuecomment-428003735, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcwzA0xZbj0Abj9DEZV8gVgRwQljK4H_ks5ui9Z2gaJpZM4XNyW- .[image: Image removed by sender.]

ddalthorp commented 6 years ago

should not be too much trouble to add the carcass counts to splits tables.

With temporal splits, though, it will look a little funny because X is associated with when the carcass arrived rather than when it was observed, so those X's are probabilistic smears of carcasses into the times where they were likely to have arrived and not integer-valued. They sum to nice integers, though!

mhuso commented 6 years ago

Yes, I thought of that and was wondering what it would look like. Maybe the “fuzz” is good – emphasizing to people the uncertainty of the exact arrival interval.

From: ddalthorp notifications@github.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 7:04 PM To: ddalthorp/GenEst GenEst@noreply.github.com Cc: Manuela Huso mhuso@usgs.gov; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ddalthorp/GenEst] Trial N for CP and SE results tables (#601)

should not be too much trouble to add the carcass counts to splits tables.

With temporal splits, though, it will look a little funny because X is associated with when the carcass arrived rather than when it was observed, so those X's are probabilistic smears of carcasses into the times where they were likely to have arrived and not integer-valued. They sum to nice integers, though!

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ddalthorp/GenEst/issues/601#issuecomment-428035066, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcwzA4I04WsM0Zy4RDoo9qf2T2ok4PZvks5ujAQWgaJpZM4XNyW- .[image: Image removed by sender.]