search

ddanelynn / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Instructions for manual testing is poorly written #17

Open ddanelynn opened 3 years ago

ddanelynn commented 3 years ago

Only the first command has instructions and test cases given. The rest are omitted and direct readers to UG, which shows lack of effort.

Screenshot 2021-04-16 at 3.17.32 PM.png

nus-pe-bot commented 3 years ago

Team's Response

Thank you for the response.

"Showing lack of effort" is not really a bug.

Also, as mentioned in the Deliverables section, the appendix of the DG should not repeat information in the UG, so referring the reader to the UG is not a problem.

image.png

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: Instructions for manual testing is not a duplicate of what is stated in user guide as instructions for manual testing contain expected results for different use cases. In UG, there are only examples for the feature, with some including the outcome of correct commands. However, there is no examples of invalid commands and expected result of invalid commands stated. Lack of details for manual testing may hinder the tester's testing progress and I personally feel it should be considered as an issue.