ddobrev / QtSharp

Mono/.NET bindings for Qt
Other
571 stars 51 forks source link

VC++ support #42

Open ethanhs opened 8 years ago

ethanhs commented 8 years ago

I know you don't have it currently, but I would love to see it.

ddobrev commented 8 years ago

Hello @IronManMark20 . I am afraid that unless money is involved, VC++ is indeed an extremely minor priority to me. I have two more major features to add to C++#/Qt#, one of them far from trivial, then I have to add continuous integration, and then I want to ensure proper Linux and OS X support. May I ask for the exact reasons you need the VC++ version of Qt? I would like to discuss it because it might turn out that Qt MinGW would work for you just as well.

ethanhs commented 8 years ago

The biggest issue is that MinGW is not compatible with MSVC binaries, so I would have to re-compile the most popular libraries and other things I am using. It also would limit Qt# to the desktop (I have an eye towards using it in a UWP app).

I don't need it now, I just want it to happen.

ddobrev commented 8 years ago

I understand. Well, if I get to wrapping Qt for VC++ at a reasonable time from now, I'll let you know.

ethanhs commented 8 years ago

No worries, I am watching the repo. Keep up the good work!

hezhaowei commented 7 years ago

I would love to see it also