Closed tjhei closed 4 years ago
Yes. If things run with 9.2, we might as well require that.
I'd be happy with us checking that all of the codes run on the latest release, fixing any errors, and then just doing a version bump for all of them. We could always create a version tag so that people can still get the "old" versions of the code if they need to.
Please let me know what the ultimate decision is. #49 has been sitting around for an embarrassingly long time, so I plan on checking that it builds, patching it if necessary and merging it before the release. I took a quick look at it yesterday and it all looks pretty neat and tidy.
On 5/1/20 1:33 PM, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
49
https://github.com/dealii/code-gallery/pull/49 has been sitting around for an embarrassingly long time, so I plan on checking that, patching it if necessary and merging it before the release. I took a quick look at it yesterday and it all looks pretty neat and tidy.
That would be absolutely super. I would love to have that code reviewed. @jcc42 was in my class and I didn't want to review the code because I don't like reviewing my own students' codes. But I would have made that clear in the PR at the time :-(
Many of the examples require older version of deal.II and no longer compile. I think it might be worth bumping the minimum version and updating at least to 9.1: