Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This is, of course, not a defect but an enhancement request. Thanks
Original comment by ctemp...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2010 at 1:25
So don't call the swfobject functions until the user has accepted the use of
Flash...
The paage can invoke the required swfobject js methods when and if required
I don't really see how the non-use of SWFObject is a enhancement request :)
Am I missing something?
Original comment by aran.rhee@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2010 at 8:13
Thanks for your reply. I'm not talking about loading my movies. I can handle
that. :)
Rather, testPlayerVersion() creates its own flash object and temporarily adds
it to
the DOM. This is triggered by the event DOMContentLoaded, which happens too
early in
the page lifecycle to gather user feedback.
It would be great if this loading of a test flash object could be optionally
disabled.
Original comment by ctemp...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2010 at 1:06
Gotcha.
Two ways of moving forward now a) patch swfobject to your liking, or b) include
the
swfobject.js dynamically once you have decided it is "flash time". Something
like:
function include_dom(script_filename) {
var html_doc = document.getElementsByTagName('head').item(0);
var js = document.createElement('script');
js.setAttribute('language', 'javascript');
js.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript');
js.setAttribute('src', script_filename);
html_doc.appendChild(js);
return false;
}
I have remarked the status as 'new', and it will be discussed amongst the team
members.
Original comment by aran.rhee@gmail.com
on 28 Apr 2010 at 12:09
SWFObject does not need to be modified to provide this support.
* testPlayerVersion is only invoked as part of the domready sequence used by
swfobject.embedSWF(). swfobject.createSWF() does not invoke testPlayerVersion.
* if you don't want to use testPlayerVersion without the visitor's permission,
write a custom JavaScript function that only invokes embedSWF() or createSWF()
after the visitor grants permission.
(BTW, testPlayerVersion() does *not* embed an actual SWF file, it creates an
*empty* <object>, so I don't see how this violates someone's trust or security.
No SWFs are ever loaded.)
Original comment by platelu...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2010 at 9:57
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ctemp...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2010 at 1:24