Description: - Section 8 [9]: There is only one actual normative word used in this section! There is a lc "should" that ought to be "SHOULD". I don't know if the authors assumed that the normative language in TURN was sufficient, but I do not believe that is the case as it leaves the normative behavior to be inferred by the reader/implementor. Rather than rewrite the whole section myself, the authors need to review carefully. For example, there are "needs to", which likely are really and lots of present tense statements (e.g., "The address of the peer is stored…"), which ought to be MUSTs or SHOULDs.
From: Mary Barnes
Description: - Section 8 [9]: There is only one actual normative word used in this section! There is a lc "should" that ought to be "SHOULD". I don't know if the authors assumed that the normative language in TURN was sufficient, but I do not believe that is the case as it leaves the normative behavior to be inferred by the reader/implementor. Rather than rewrite the whole section myself, the authors need to review carefully. For example, there are "needs to", which likely are really and lots of present tense statements (e.g., "The address of the peer is stored…"), which ought to be MUSTs or SHOULDs.
Notes: Will try to fix text as best as I can