Description: I also strongly recommend that you ensure Henning has reviewed this document before it gets into the RFC editor's queue. He has fairly strict (and quite accurate) views on grammar and structure but it really isn't good to have so many changes go in at AUTH48 as there is a risk of introducing true technical bugs or changing something that was carefully crafted to achieve WG consensus:
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/etc/writing-bugs.html
Notes: Will do a pass on the whole document with those advices in mind.
From: Mary Barnes
Description: I also strongly recommend that you ensure Henning has reviewed this document before it gets into the RFC editor's queue. He has fairly strict (and quite accurate) views on grammar and structure but it really isn't good to have so many changes go in at AUTH48 as there is a risk of introducing true technical bugs or changing something that was carefully crafted to achieve WG consensus: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/etc/writing-bugs.html
Notes: Will do a pass on the whole document with those advices in mind.