Add CodeQL workflow for GitHub code scanning

[lgtm-com[bot]]

Hi debrouxl/tilibs!

This is a one-off automatically generated pull request from LGTM.com :robot:. You might have heard that we’ve integrated LGTM’s underlying CodeQL analysis engine natively into GitHub. The result is GitHub code scanning!

With LGTM fully integrated into code scanning, we are focused on improving CodeQL within the native GitHub code scanning experience. In order to take advantage of current and future improvements to our analysis capabilities, we suggest you enable code scanning on your repository. Please take a look at our blog post for more information.

This pull request enables code scanning by adding an auto-generated codeql.yml workflow file for GitHub Actions to your repository — take a look! Whilst we've attempted to make use of the existing configuration that you had on LGTM.com, there may be some differences in environment used to build the project. We hope that in most cases it will not require significant changes to achieve a successful analysis. Check this page for detailed documentation on how to configure a CodeQL workflow.

Questions? Check out the FAQ below!

FAQ

Click here to expand the FAQ section

#### How often will the code scanning analysis run? By default, code scanning will trigger a scan with the CodeQL engine on the following events: * On every pull request — to flag up potential security problems for you to investigate before merging a PR. * On every push to your default branch and other protected branches — this keeps the analysis results on your repository’s *Security* tab up to date. * Once a week at a fixed time — to make sure you benefit from the latest updated security analysis even when no code was committed or PRs were opened. #### What will this cost? Nothing! The CodeQL engine will run inside GitHub Actions, making use of your [unlimited free compute minutes for public repositories](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/usage-limits-billing-and-administration#about-billing-for-github-actions). #### What types of problems does CodeQL find? The CodeQL engine that powers GitHub code scanning is the exact same engine that powers LGTM.com. The exact set of rules has been tweaked slightly, but you should see almost exactly the same types of alerts as you were used to on LGTM.com: we’ve enabled the [`security-and-quality` query suite](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/configuring-code-scanning#using-queries-in-ql-packs) for you. #### How do I upgrade my CodeQL engine? No need! New versions of the CodeQL analysis are constantly deployed on GitHub.com; your repository will automatically benefit from the most recently released version. #### The analysis doesn’t seem to be working If you get an error in GitHub Actions that indicates that CodeQL wasn’t able to analyze your code, please [follow the instructions here](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/troubleshooting-the-codeql-workflow) to debug the analysis. #### How do I disable LGTM.com? If you have LGTM’s automatic pull request analysis enabled, then you can [follow these steps to disable the LGTM pull request analysis](https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/managing-automated-code-review#disabling-pr-integration). You don’t actually need to remove your repository from LGTM.com; it will automatically be removed in the next few months as part of the deprecation of LGTM.com ([more info here](https://github.blog/2022-08-15-the-next-step-for-lgtm-com-github-code-scanning/)). #### Which source code hosting platforms does code scanning support? GitHub code scanning is deeply integrated within GitHub itself. If you’d like to scan source code that is hosted elsewhere, we suggest that you create a mirror of that code on GitHub. #### How do I know this PR is legitimate? This PR is filed by the official LGTM.com GitHub App, in line with the [deprecation timeline that was announced on the official GitHub Blog](https://github.blog/2022-08-15-the-next-step-for-lgtm-com-github-code-scanning/). The proposed GitHub Action workflow uses the [official open source GitHub CodeQL Action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/). If you have any other questions or concerns, please join the discussion [here](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/29534) in the official GitHub community! #### I have another question / how do I get in touch? Please join the discussion [here](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/29534) to ask further questions and send us suggestions!

[adriweb]

Could be interesting.

Speaking of automated static analysis, there's also an action we can pretty much copy-paste from CEmu's repo, to get Coverity scan.

[debrouxl]

• indeed, this PR is interesting, all the more lgtm.com is shutting down soon;
• I dropped the ball on Coverity scan partially because scanning was a manual process, so yeah, I'm interested in integrating such an automated Github action to tilibs :)

[adriweb]

I was going to say, it didn't look like it was able to run as-is, hence the configure failure :P