wongsuifeng commented 6 years ago

Freedom city -- All free people can cooperate freely

About the city's planning, in front of the Chinese description, followed by English translation

By the way, the reading experience on the phone will be better.

整篇文章很长，包含了我对decentraland的理解，对这座城市的理念介绍，以及整座城市的设想。你可以复制链接在手机上面看，阅读体验会好一点。

1

首先来说说，你能从这个游戏里得到什么？

在这个游戏里面你可以得到三样东西，一是绝对的控制权，二是新鲜刺激的体验，三是钱。

人在做任何事情都有一个目的，往小了说就是掌控自己的生活，往大了说就是掌控自己的命运。

你为什么会上大学？因为你希望找到更好的工作，将来有更好的生活。你为什么会和一个人结婚？因为你知道，跟她结婚以后，你的生活会变得更好。这都是你的选择，你的选择在构筑你的生活。

在游戏中，人们也是为了获得掌控感。不管是FPS游戏、MOBA类游戏，还是RTS游戏，甚至是连连看、俄罗斯方块。在你赢得胜利的那一刻，你会认为，你获得了掌控感，你证明了自我的存在。

但传统世界跟区块链世界有很大的不同。

你在银行的钱，只是银行给你显示的后台数据；你在现实中买了一块地，这块地是有使用年限的。所有的这些，并不永远属于你。

在传统的游戏世界里，有很多的游戏规则，这些规则都是游戏公司为了盈利而创造出来的。很多东西并不符合你的设想，你也不希望他们这么做，但是你改变不了这些。游戏公司的态度是要么忍、要么滚，我们作为用户没有任何决定权。

在decentraland里，所有的这些都得到了改变。你能完全掌握你在游戏里的所有资源，你手里的mana和你购买的土地完全属于你自己，没有人能够修改它们。

你要在游戏里做什么？你要买卖什么商品？你要建设什么样的房子？你通过什么方式来盈利？你要怎么跟别人交流？这些你都有完全的控制权，并没有别人强制你做什么。

用一句话来说就是：在decentraland里面，你是自由的。

新鲜刺激的体验来源于未知。

正是因为你对这个游戏不够了解，你从第一次进入，到最后把它建设成自己心中设想的样子，会有很多路要走。在你完成设想的过程中，你才能做从中获得新鲜刺激的体验。如果你对所有的流程都一清二楚，那么，你得到的，只是纯粹的复制品。

如果把生命当做一段旅行，终点是固定的，每个人的区别在于过程的不同。如果你在一年的生活里，每一天都是一模一样，那你只是把一天重复了一年而已。

你有多久没有去探索过新的东西？

未知的东西可以让人产生恐惧，但是，所有的新鲜感也都来自于未知。如果所有的东西你都是熟悉的，那么它并不能给你带来任何乐趣。

在decentraland里，你会和小伙伴一起找到探索的乐趣。

关于钱，这个就更好理解了。

你手里的mana和购买的土地，就是decentraland世界的股份。如果以后这个游戏可以做成，你可以在游戏里做出好项目换取mana，也可以把mana和土地兑换成法币。

2

自由之城的治理理念用一句话概括就是：自由人的自由联合。

整座城市的规则只有一个，那就是：没有规则。

在自由之城，并不存在统一管理、统一规划，你完全掌控自己的土地。你可以选择自己在上面建设什么，也可以把它卖掉，没有人去规定你必须要做什么。

要做到这一点需要有一个前提，那就是「完全的私有制」。

每一个理论都是有一个前提的，就像欧式几何的前提是三条公设；牛顿力学的前提是「万有引力」；整个自由之城理念的前提是「私有制」，每个人都能掌握他自己的东西。

如果从效率的方面来考虑的话，前期最好的建设模式就是，先组建一个基金会，由基金会统一管理、统一建设，这个可以最大的提升效率，把整个城市建设起来。

但是自由之城不会怎么做，虽然这么做的话在前期可以解决效率问题，但是在后期，会有很多的麻烦，这个城市会越来越没有活力。而且最主要的是，这种方式与这个游戏的本质并不符合。

你可以想一下，自由之城如果是用统一规划、统一管理的方式，那么它跟现实世界有什么区别呢？

在现实中，每个公司都是中心化组织的方式，有老板来统一规划、制定战略，下属去完成。员工并不能完全拥有公司的资源，只是一个边缘的参与者。

现在的主权国家也是一样的，你作为一个国家的公民，你能对这个国家做什么呢？有什么东西是属于你自己的呢？你的个人意见，对于这个国家的建设有什么作用呢？

换到游戏里也是一样，如果是统一管理，有两个办法。

一是所有的决定都通过投票来产生，但这种方法效率是极低的，基本什么事都干不了。最主要的是，「少数服从多数」这种方法并不是真正的公平，每当「少数服从多数」发生的时候，就意味着少数人的利益受到了损害。人群中总是有少数派存在，他们不愿意随大流，只想安安静静地做自己的事，他们不想伤害别人，同时也不想被人胁迫。

二是由少数几个人来决定这个城市时要建成什么样子，那么作为参与者，你的意见就没有任何价值，一切就是别人说了算。至于你的土地会建成什么样子，以及产生收益后怎么花，也跟你没有关系。一切都跟现实世界没有区别，这样做等于回到了原点。

3

中心化组织会面临一个永恒的问题：它总是在追求稳定，但它一旦实现了稳定，也就离崩溃不远了。

从有人类开始，人们经历了各种各样的组织方式。从一开始的部落首领制到封建制、君主制、资本主义、共产主义，所有的制度并没有实际解决人们的问题。当一种制度崩溃了以后，人们会设想另外一种制度，来去解决原有的问题，但是我们可以回头看一下，所有的改革都是失败的。

在封建社会里士农工商各司其职，人人安居乐业的目标实现了吗？共产主义让人人平等的目标实现了吗？

只要你是中心化组织，统一管理、统一规划，最后的结果只有一个，那就是整个系统崩溃。

热力学第二定律解释了为什么会这样的原因：在一个封闭的系统，熵只会增加。

人们总是在追求系统的稳定，但是稳定只会带来崩溃，因为世界是在不断变化的。

如果我们选择中心化管理，前期很有效率，这个很好理解，因为统一规划统一调度是最有效率的。在号称最民主的美国也一样，在平时，总统的权力是被制约的，但是在战争时期，总统把持所有的权利。这样可以用最快的速度，把全国上下的力量调动起来，从而把所有的资源都堆到战争前线，确保战争的胜利。

当然，人们不是每时每刻都在打仗的，在和平时期，这种中心化管理，就要他的毛病存在。当你去政府机关去办手续的时候，就能明显的感受到这种制度的不合理，你需要证明你妈是你妈，你需要准备各种各样的材料，你需要等待他们的审核。这其中每一件事，都需要你花费大量的时间。

在工作中，大公司根本比不上小公司的工作效率，越是大公司，人浮于事、效率低下的情况越严重，一旦进行改革，会有各个利益方来平衡博弈。很多大公司与其说是被对手打败的，不如说是被自己拖死的。

4

在日本福岛核泄漏事故中，因为事先完全没有准备，到处都是一团糟。数万人逃离家园，恐慌情绪蔓延。政府极力救灾，但人手和资源毕竟有限，连官方公布的各地污染数据都是错的。政府把一些灾民转移出来，可是有人发现，政府指定的新安置地点的污染程度居然比这些灾民原来住的地方还要严重。

人们必须自救，可是现在甚至没人知道哪里是安全的。

一个身在海外的科学家发出一封邮件给几位同行，号召懂技术的人为救灾做点什么。讨论的结果是，必须迅速搞到一批环境监测设备，但是灾难发生以来这个设备太抢手，已经买不到现成的了。

几个人发起了一个网上社区，更多的人参与进来，大家干脆决定自己制造：一个创业公司设计出来了更方便好用的新款设备，一个众包网站帮着筹集了款项，一家本地公司完成了生产，一大群志愿者把监测设备绑在汽车上走街串巷，他们很快就收集了超过5000万个数据点，放在一个知识共享网站上供人们随时查阅……

政府解决不了的问题，被这些人给解决了。

随着互联网的发展，一种新的制度出现了，那就是「自组织」。

每一个单个的蚂蚁都没什么智能，做的事也很简单，几乎全是本能反应，但是成千上万只蚂蚁聚在一起，却可以做一些极其精妙复杂的事情。

人的大脑中有上千亿个神经元，每个神经元都是很简单的，就像是一个电子元件，可是所有这些神经元加在一起，却能让人产生智能和意识。

这些现象，在科学中被称为「涌现」现象，对应到组织架构上，就是「自组织」。

市场经济就是典型的「自组织」：每个人都只会自己的一点点专业技能，甚至没有一个人掌握从头至尾制造一根铅笔的全部手艺，但是众人合作，却可以造出无比复杂的东西来。

5

在自由之城的发展中，我们也会用这种「自组织」的方式来发展。

很多人觉得自己要不要学点建模技术，来盖自己的房子；要不要学习编程，来做自己的项目。其实，根本用不着。

市场的问题交给市场去解决。你不会做饭，这并不妨碍你吃饱饭；你不会做衣服，这并不会让你出门时裸奔；你不会制造手机，仍然能够打电话。

在decentraland里，项目方负责整体的基础架构，我们作为投资方，mana和土地就是我们的资源。在后期，会有无数的第三方团队来满足我们的需求。不管你是想要交通工具还是盖房子，都会有人给你提供服务。

如果你要建设一个项目，但是你的钱不够，或者是地不够，怎么办？

你可以跟别人合作，找到对你这个项目感兴趣的人，大家有人的出人，有钱的出钱，把这个项目搞起来。甚至，你还可以在游戏里发行这个项目的ICO。

没有人是自由之城的管理者，或者说，每个人都是自由之城的管理者。

自由之城的理念就是：自由人的自由联合。

6

关于要在游戏里做什么项目，我说点自己的想法，我并不建议你去建设什么赌场或者红灯区。

很多人都觉得这两个生意是最暴利的，但是我不知道你有没有想过，如果一个生意每个人都能做，那它就不是一个好生意。如果每一个人都去开赌场或者是红灯区，那么谁会去消费呢？难道是你建完之后你自己来消费吗？

除此之外，并不是每一个人来玩这个游戏都是为了赌博和去红灯区的。这个世界有很多东西，比这两样东西更有意思。

赌博和性是人的本能欲望，问题是人们最高级的精神享受，并不是满足这些本能欲望来决定的。

在性爱中，那些令你刻骨铭心的享受，并不是你看个毛片打个飞机来获得的，也不是你跟一个陌生人做爱来获得的，而是跟你喜欢的人。合适的人最重要，场景并不重要。

赌博也是一样，如果你是一个懂得概率论的人，那么你就不会买彩票，你也不会长期沉溺于赌博，因为你知道，从概率上来说，长期进行下去自己只能输。在区块链世界里，人们会通过预测市场来替代赌博。比如说当有一场比赛的时候，你喜欢的球队会不会赢？你喜欢的游戏战队会不会赢？在这个过程中，游戏才是最主要的，而赌博只是一个副产品。所以说，如果你的主要目标是建设澳门赌场似的场所，那么，你很难盈利。

这其中的关键是,你能不能让别人在观看比赛的时更好的提供服务。

7

刚才说的是去中心化组织的种种好处，既然去中心化组织这么好，为什么从有人类开始，一直到现在都是中心化组织呢？

因为去中心化组织需要解决两个问题，一个是信息交流的问题，一个是信任问题。只有解决了这个两个问题，去中心化组织才有实现的可能，否则一切都是免谈。

一开始，在交通基本靠走通信基本靠吼的年代里，人们沟通交流只能通过口耳相传。接着有了马和驿站，但是这个信息交流的速度还是太慢了。自从有了互联网出现，人们解决了信息交流的问题。你在现在发出一个信息，在地球的另一端，别人可以很快的接收到，信息可以实时传送，没有延迟。

互联网让地球变成了平的。

在生活中，人与人之间的信任成本很高，不可能随随便便相信一个人。为了解决这个问题，让人更有效率，中介就出现了。媒婆、房产中介都是为了解决人的信任问题而出现的第三方中介。

现在有了区块链，等于有了更好的工具来解决原有的效率问题。人们通过程序来完成一些本来由人来完成的工作，人与人直接对接，减少中间环节，于是，带来了更高的效率。

区块链的本质是「去信任」。

这跟传统社会里你信任别人多一点，或者是信任别人少一点有本质的区别。在区块链的世界里，根本不存在信任不信任这件事，所有的中介都变成了程序。

代码即法律。

只要代码是正确的，那么你就不用担心对方会骗你。

这也是为什么说，工业革命改变了生产力，而区块链改变了生产关系。

8

互联网让世界变成平的，沟通万物，连接万物。

人与人交往方式变了，工作方式变了，出行的方式变了，甚至连吃饭的方式也变了。

软件正在吞噬世界。

最终，人们在虚拟世界的所有行为都会映射到现实世界。

地区名称：自由之城

项目负责人：没有负责人，至于原因，前面已经说得很清楚了

团队：每一个拥有土地的人都是团队成员

目标：这是一场社会实验，我想知道在完全去中心化的路上人们能走多远。

类别：公开

需要土地：不限

启动成本：不限

贡献者如何看待回报价值：每个人都为了自己的利益努力，最终达到整体利益的最大化。

这个项目没有负责人，我只是项目发起人。如果你想和我聊聊，可以加我微信：15071367876，或者是发邮件给我：wang17520469022@gmail.com

1

First of all, what can you get from this game? In this game which you can get three things, one is the absolute control, the second is the fresh stimulation of the experience, the third is money. People have to do anything to have a purpose, to the small that is to control their own lives, to the big that is to control their own destiny. Why are you going to college? Because you want to find a better job, a better life in the future. Why would you marry a man? Because you know that after marriage with her, your life will become better. This is your choice, your choice to build your life. In the game, people are also in order to gain control. Whether it is FPS games, MOBA games, or RTS games, and even Lianliankan, Tetris. At the moment you win, you will think that you have a sense of control, and you prove the existence of the self. But the traditional world is very different from the block chain world. Your money in the bank, but the bank to show you the background data; you buy a piece of land in reality, this land is a useful life. All of these do not always belong to you. In the traditional game world, there are many rules of the game, these rules are the game company to create for profitability. A lot of things do not fit your idea, you do not want them to do so, but you can not change these. The game company's attitude is either to endure, or roll, we as the user without any decision. In decentraland, all of these have changed. You can fully grasp all your resources in the game, your hands mana and you buy the land is entirely your own, no one can modify them. What do you want to do in the game? What merchandise do you want to trade? What kind of house do you want to build? What is your way to profit? How do you communicate with others? You have full control of these, and no one else to force you to do anything. In a word is: in decentraland inside, you are free. Fresh stimulus experience comes from unknown. It is because you do not know enough about this game, you from the first time to enter, and finally to build it into their own minds look like, there will be a lot of way to go. In the process of completing your vision, you can get a fresh stimulus experience. If you are all clear about all the processes, then you get, just pure replicas. If life as a travel, the end is fixed, the difference between each person is the process of different. If you are in the life of the year, every day is exactly the same, then you just repeat the day for a year only. How long have you been to explore new things? Unknown things can make people fear, but all the freshness also comes from the unknown. If you are familiar with all the things, then it does not give you any pleasure. In decentraland, you will find the fun of exploring with your little partner. On the money, this is better understood. The mana in your hand and the land purchased is the shares of the decentraland world. If the game can be made later, you can make a good project in the game mana, mana and land can also be converted into French dollars.

2

The rule of the city of freedom is summed up in one sentence:All free people can cooperate freely。

There is only one rule in the whole city: no rules

In the city of freedom, there is no unified management, unified planning, you have complete control of their own land. You can choose what you build on the above, you can also sell it, no one to specify what you have to do.

There is a need to do this, that is, "complete private ownership."

Every theory has a prerequisite, as the premise of the European geometry is three public; Newtonian mechanics premise is "gravitation"; the concept of the city of freedom is the premise of "private ownership", everyone can master his own things The

If the efficiency from the aspects to consider, then the best early construction model is to first set up a foundation, unified management by the Foundation, unified construction, which can maximize the efficiency of the whole city to build up.

But the city of freedom will not do, although doing so in the early can solve the problem of efficiency, but in the latter part, there will be a lot of trouble, the city will be more and less dynamic. And most of all, this way does not fit the nature of the game.

You can think about, if the city of freedom is unified planning, unified management of the way, then it is the difference with the real world it?

In reality, each company is the way the central organization, there are bosses to unified planning, strategy, subordinates to complete. Employees can not fully own the company's resources, just an edge of the participants.

Now the sovereign state is the same, you as a national citizen, what can you do to this country? Is there anything that belongs to you? What is your personal opinion for the construction of this country?

Change to the game is the same, if it is unified management, there are two ways.

First, all the decisions are generated by voting, but the efficiency of this method is very low, basically what things can not do.Most of all, the " minority obedience majority" approach is not really fair, and whenever " minority obedience" occurs, it means that the interests of the minority are damaged. There are always a minority in the crowd, they are not willing to go with the stream, just want to do their own things quietly, they do not want to hurt others, but also do not want to be coerced.

Second, by a few people to decide what kind of city to be built, then as a participant, your opinion will not have any value, everything is someone else has the final say. As for what your land will be built, and how to produce income after the flower, but also you have no relationship. Everything is no different from the real world, this is equivalent to return to the origin.

3

The central organization will face an eternal problem: It is always in the pursuit of stability, but once it has achieved stability, it is not far from the collapse.

From the beginning of human beings, people have experienced a variety of organizational methods. From the beginning of the tribal leadership system to the feudal system, monarchy, capitalism, communism, all the system did not actually solve people's problems. When a system collapses, people will think of another system, to solve the original problem, but we can look back, all the reform is a failure.

In the feudal society, the businessmen of Sri Lanka in the performance of their duties, everyone live and work to achieve the goal? Does communism make everyone equal goals come true?

As long as you are a central organization, unified management, unified planning, the final result is only one, that is, the whole system crashes.

The second law of thermodynamics explains why such a reason: in a closed system, entropy will only increase.

People are always pursuing system stability, but stability will only bring about collapse, because the world is constantly changing.

If we choose the central management, early very efficient, this is a good understanding, because unified planning unified scheduling is the most efficient. In the United States, also known as the most democratic, in the usual, the president's power is restricted, but in the war, the president holds all the rights. So that the fastest speed can be used to mobilize the power from top to bottom, so that all the resources are piled up to the war front, to ensure the victory of the war.

Of course, people are not always in the war, in peacetime, this central management, it is necessary for his problems. When you go to the government authorities to go to the formalities, you can clearly feel the irrationality of this system, you need to prove that your mother is your mother, you need to prepare a variety of materials, you need to wait for their review. Everything in this matter requires you to spend a lot of time.

In the work, large companies simply less than the efficiency of small companies, the greater the company, people overstaffed, the more inefficient situation, once the reform, there will be various stakeholders to balance the game. Many big companies are not so much opponents to defeat, as it is being dragged by their own.

4

Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan, because there is no preparation in advance, everywhere is a mess. Tens of thousands of people fled their homes, panic spread. The government is trying to save the disaster, but the manpower and resources are limited, and even the official pollution data is wrong. The government transferred some of the victims, but it was found that the government designated the new resettlement site pollution level than the victims of the original place to live even more serious.

People must save themselves, but now even no one knows where it is safe.

A scientist who is abroad to send an e-mail to several peers, called to understand the technology to do something for the disaster relief. The result of the discussion was that a number of environmental monitoring equipment had to be quickly reached, but the equipment had been too handy since the disaster had taken place and had not been readily available.

A few people launched an online community, more people involved, we simply decided to make their own manufacturing: a start-up company designed a more convenient and easy to use the new equipment, a crowdsourcing site helped raise money, a local company completed Production, a large group of volunteers to monitor the equipment tied to the car on the street, they quickly collected more than 50 million data points, on a knowledge sharing site for people to consult at any time ... ...

The government can not solve the problem, these people to solve.

With the development of the Internet, a new system emerges, that is, "self-organization".

Every single ants are no intelligence, do things very simple, almost all instinctive reaction, but tens of thousands of ants together, but can do some very sophisticated things complicated.

There are hundreds of billions of neurons in the brain, each neuron is very simple, like an electronic component, but all of these neurons together, but it can produce people and intelligence.

These phenomena, known in science as "emerging" phenomena, correspond to the organizational structure, that is, "self-organization."

Market economy is a typical "self-organization": everyone will only own a little bit of professional skills, or even no one master from scratch to create a pencil all the craft, but everyone cooperation, but can create very complex things Come.