search

decentralized-identity / confidential-storage

Confidential Storage Specification and Implementation
https://identity.foundation/confidential-storage/
Apache License 2.0
79 stars 23 forks source link

Can I get added to this groups slack channel? #9

Closed markchipman closed 4 years ago

markchipman commented 6 years ago

I'm glad I stumbled across this group... you're thinking along the same lines as I have been. I'd like access to the Slack account for myself (markchipman at gmail dot com) so I can participate.

Thanks,

Mark Chipman

csuwildcat commented 6 years ago

We just created a new Contributors team here in our GitHub org where you can jump on and discuss anything you'd like, or contribute to the various areas we're working on. I sent an invite to the email you specified, let me know if you get it.

csuwildcat commented 6 years ago

Sorry, had to re-add - we're trying to figure this Team discussion thing out

davux commented 6 years ago

Hello,

I would like to be invited to the discussion group too, please.

I think if this is going to be an open standard, it should be possible for any interested party to join the discussion easily.

Thank you.

jeremi commented 6 years ago

I'd be interested to join also the slack. We are working on SSI as well for humanitarian.

ydennisy commented 6 years ago

me too!

dennis (at) orbislabs (dot) org

davux commented 6 years ago

It looks like this isn't as open as it looks. I personally never got any response to my request.

csuwildcat commented 6 years ago

The slack channel is part of the members organization, though we've discussed opening a forum like chat for real-time collaboration. I will talk with the members about this after the holiday.

On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 8:41 PM David Ammouial notifications@github.com wrote:

It looks like this isn't as open as it looks. I personally never got any response to my request.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/decentralized-identity/identity-hub/issues/40#issuecomment-417992387, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAICyhoN3FMdaiHYnyr-kOyEca7P0FNlks5uXKTlgaJpZM4TVITH .

ajunge commented 5 years ago

@csuwildcat can we close this issue?

davux commented 5 years ago

Maybe as "wontfix" then. :) Too bad there isn't an open space. If even the chat room is members-only I'd hardly call it an open standards foundation, more like a lobby or a consortium of companies perhaps.

csuwildcat commented 5 years ago

We're actively discussing opening all comms. It's technically a 501c(6) member organization, but I understand, and we're moving the direction you prefer.

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 9:05 PM David Ammouial notifications@github.com wrote:

Maybe as "wontfix" then. :) Too bad there isn't an open space. If even the chat room is members-only I'd hardly call it an open standards foundation, more like a lobby or a consortium of companies perhaps.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/decentralized-identity/identity-hub/issues/40#issuecomment-429197901, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAICytmdl6Cw6VpPKeouwDY92ivsSi5Sks5ukBUOgaJpZM4TVITH .

adamjbradley commented 5 years ago

Perhaps we can set up a "temporary" meeting space until this has been formalised...

davux commented 5 years ago

Well, you know... I'm suggesting that a group (of companies) that promotes itself as standards-defining use transparent discussion channels. I'm not sure it's fair to call that the "direction [I] prefer", rather it's probably everyone's priority as well, isn't it?

Anyway, I have to ask: how is the active discussion going? It's been 3 months and a half.

emileindik commented 4 years ago

I'm interesting in participating in this project. Has there been any progress on forming a public forum/channel?

tplooker commented 4 years ago

Resolved on 07/05/2020 call