decentralized-identity / spec-up

Create beautiful, feature-rich technical specifications in markdown
https://identity.foundation/spec-up/
Apache License 2.0
33 stars 26 forks source link

Spec-Up git governance proposal #65

Open henkvancann opened 2 months ago

henkvancann commented 2 months ago

Our enhancement proposal and git governance strategy is here: https://hackmd.io/s1TEBBluQBSL10ZT5yRVPw. The Concepts and Terminology workgroup of ToIP would love to move forward this way and we’d like to hear your opinion / questions and hopefully we can reach consensus about the way forward. Best regards, Henk

csuwildcat commented 2 months ago

Why can't you just add some folks here as maintainers?

henkvancann commented 2 months ago

That would be great. But it's a DIF decision to grant these rights. If I were to become (one of) the extra maintainer(s), I could keep an eye on diverging vs. matching objectives between DIF and ToIP and act accordingly in accepting PRs.

henkvancann commented 1 month ago

Who to contact to be added as maintainers?

I suggest https://github.com/kordwarshuis (@kordwarshuis) and myself (@henkvancann )

csuwildcat commented 1 month ago

Let's get in whoever wants to help

csuwildcat commented 1 month ago

So how would you all like to start? I am totally open to make this a collaborative project with ToIP and other contributors.

henkvancann commented 1 month ago

That would be awesome: a collaborative project!

If you'd add us as maintainers of the DIF repo, we could choose the consent method for our improvements to Spec-up. If you want to become a maintainer of Spec-Up-T, too, be our guest.

We have to move Spec-Up-T-related stuff from github user Blockchainbird to trustoverip; that's a just chore because I'm co-chair of the workgroup at ToIP and all members have approved our Spec-Up-T developments.

This would make life easier than what we've described here: https://hackmd.io/s1TEBBluQBSL10ZT5yRVPw#No-go-solo, which is a strict PR-based approach.

We would "bring back home" to DIF improvements that Kor Dwarshuis can explain much better. Look at the spec-up(-t) related repos at https://github.com/blockchainbird to see what we've coded.

You could indicate what you like and don't like about our developments to bring into Spec-Up or leave in Spec-Up-T. We keep that smaller set in "T" while remaining in sync with Spec-Up (DIF) as usual. We might need to create new repos at DIF if you for example fancy the documentation site or the npm install scripts.

Suggestion: At the start, we will report every action in the DIF Spec-Up repo upfront. Later, we could use consent: if you don't object, we move forward.

Just my two cents. I'm already a DIF member; Kor could quickly become one.

henkvancann commented 1 week ago

We've created the user manual: https://blockchainbird.github.io/spec-up-t-website/