Open brianorwhatever opened 2 months ago
As I was writing this — I think the answer is that the DID of the DID Controller MUST be a did:key, and MUST be in the authorized key array. Conversely, witness did’s MUST NOT be did:key
, and witness DIDs MUST be in the witness list.
A bit of data sniffing, but I don’t think outrageous. The question is whether it is better or worse than using Proof Chains, given their lack of implementations?
@brianorwhatever -- do you want to see this added to the spec? Seems it would be useful.
For now what I am doing is checking if the verification method is a did:tdw
or did:key
. tdw is assumed to be a witness and key is assumed to be a controller
Action: As a clarification, without changing the version. @swcurran
Currently the only difference between a witness proof and a controller's proof is that the witness will likely be a
did:tdw
. This isn't a particularly useful way to determine which is which. I think we need a better technique.. might be one reason for #66