In other words, could tdw be used as a [7.2.3.] Decentralized Identifier in a Self-Issued OpenID Provider?
I guess I’m looking for a modern sequel to the discontinued did-siop, which I see some of you here co-authored 💖
The exact fit of SOIP v2 notwithstanding, I think OIDC compatibility makes a lot of sense for an optional (and equally web-native) ID management layer coupled with tdw, or something functionally similar to it.
Yes, that is correct. I would guess that any SIOP deployments using DIDs are using did:web and any use of did:web can be improved by transitioning to did:tdw.
Apologies if I’ve made faulty connections, but the way
tdw
is described seems to align very well with this:https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-self-issued-v2-1_0.html
https://medium.com/decentralized-identity/where-to-begin-with-oidc-and-siop-7dd186c89796
In other words, could tdw be used as a [7.2.3.] Decentralized Identifier in a Self-Issued OpenID Provider?
I guess I’m looking for a modern sequel to the discontinued did-siop, which I see some of you here co-authored 💖
The exact fit of SOIP v2 notwithstanding, I think OIDC compatibility makes a lot of sense for an optional (and equally web-native) ID management layer coupled with
tdw
, or something functionally similar to it.Further reading on where I’m coming from: