feat(did-manager): matching DIDs by alias should not depend on the provider

[mirceanis]

What issue is this PR fixing

fixes #1215

What is being changed

• DIDManager no longer relies on the alias+provider pair when storing or filtering identifiers. It is now impossible to use the same alias on 2 identifiers from different providers.
• Creating or importing an identifier using an alias that is already used will fail, no matter what provider is used.
• didManagerGetOrCreate still accepts a provider param in case it needs to create a new DID, but if it encounters an identifier with an existing alias but using a different provider it will throw an error.
• AbstractDIDStore.getDID() no longer uses a provider parameter.
• DID stores from @veramo/data-store and @veramo/data-store-json packages have been adapted to match the expected behavior of the DID manager

Quality

Check all that apply:

• [X] I want these changes to be integrated
• [X] I successfully ran pnpm i, pnpm build, pnpm test, pnpm test:browser locally.
• [X] I allow my PR to be updated by the reviewers (to speed up the review process).
• [X] I added unit tests.
• [X] I added integration tests.

Details

BREAKING CHANGE: The behavior of DIDManager has changed when working with alias. It is mostly ignoring provider unless it is used to create new identifiers. AbstractDIDStore APIs have been adapted and implementations have changed.

Merging this PR into main will trigger a new major release

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (ecdb2a2) 84.85% compared to head (08e4ab0) 84.85%. Report is 7 commits behind head on next.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## next #1218 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 84.85% 84.85% ======================================= Files 167 167 Lines 18065 18071 +6 Branches 2028 2029 +1 ======================================= + Hits 15329 15335 +6 Misses 2736 2736 ``` | [Files Changed](https://app.codecov.io/gh/uport-project/veramo/pull/1218?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=uport-project) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...ckages/data-store-json/src/identifier/did-store.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/uport-project/veramo/pull/1218?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=uport-project#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvZGF0YS1zdG9yZS1qc29uL3NyYy9pZGVudGlmaWVyL2RpZC1zdG9yZS50cw==) | `92.52% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [packages/data-store/src/identifier/did-store.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/uport-project/veramo/pull/1218?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=uport-project#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvZGF0YS1zdG9yZS9zcmMvaWRlbnRpZmllci9kaWQtc3RvcmUudHM=) | `96.66% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [...kages/did-manager/src/abstract-identifier-store.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/uport-project/veramo/pull/1218?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=uport-project#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvZGlkLW1hbmFnZXIvc3JjL2Fic3RyYWN0LWlkZW50aWZpZXItc3RvcmUudHM=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [packages/did-manager/src/id-manager.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/uport-project/veramo/pull/1218?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=uport-project#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvZGlkLW1hbmFnZXIvc3JjL2lkLW1hbmFnZXIudHM=) | `90.74% <100.00%> (+0.21%)` | :arrow_up: | | [packages/did-manager/src/memory-did-store.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/uport-project/veramo/pull/1218?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=uport-project#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvZGlkLW1hbmFnZXIvc3JjL21lbW9yeS1kaWQtc3RvcmUudHM=) | `91.30% <100.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.