Is this line still accurate?

decentralized-identity / waci-didcomm

Wallet And Credential Interactions for DIDComm

https://identity.foundation/waci-didcomm

Apache License 2.0

12 stars 12 forks source link

Is this line still accurate? #3

Closed bumblefudge closed 2 years ago

bumblefudge commented 2 years ago

This version of the specification also restricts itself to Verifiable Credentials that make use of BBS+ LD-Signatures.

I assume so, but:

I am unsure of the referent of "this version" - v0.1? v1?
perhaps I should go through and change every specification to profile, where the referent is this work item?

OR13 commented 2 years ago

No, that line is inaccurate, we should refine this proposal to be JsonWebSignature2020 or Ed25519Signature2018.

@troyronda please provide the minimal language you think would be most helpful for establishing conformance with AFG.

brianorwhatever commented 2 years ago

Discussed on call on 04/04/22 and said I would take a stab at this however digging in more there is quite a lot of references to BBS so a wholesale removal is challenging as it's core to the spec. Should we instead change some of the wording to say we are using JsonWebSignature2020 and Ed25519Signature2018 with plans for incorporating a new BBS suite in the future?

OR13 commented 2 years ago

use JsonWebSignature2020 and Ed25519Signature2018... don't leave any references to older bbs+...

Let's assume BBS+ never ships and only refer to things that we know work.

Lets remove all references to frame as well, lets assume that the API.

bumblefudge commented 2 years ago

addressed in #12

OR13 commented 2 years ago

calling this closed.