how a "meta-game" emerges because of live feedback of the vote
how this adds extra freedom to the voter (able to either show his vote by voting early or withhold it and not manifest it until the end)
if the writer believes this "meta-game" where someone votes in a strategic way is detrimental to the system, it should be demonstrated with some kind of empirical data or math/logic
What should be avoided:
moralizing ("people shouldn't do that") - if the system allows it and they see it as beneficial to their own self-interest (influencing others), they will do it
Write an article exploring voter psychology, various voting behavior/dynamics. Explore whether:
Discussions: