Decred would gain a lot more mainstream recognition by publishing an academia-based game theory paper that explains initial governance decisions relating to percentages chosen. Larger adoption will also require an academia-based paper per ticket to increase voter knowledge.
It would be nice to have a thorough whitepaper, although currently there are no hands to make it happen, and developers prefer to keep building. Quoting Dave:
We've collectively written plenty of information for such a paper if someone were inclined to dig back through everything. I really can't think of any part of the system that hasn't been explained in pretty significant detail.
Fork resistance, the voting process (both off-chain and on-chain), the ticket price algorithm (ther is even a full blown DCP for that one), ticket selection probabilties, etc. A few other things I can think of off the top of my head which I know have been discussed: expected block production probabilities, subsidy production schedule, SPV security properties, details about why BLAKE-256, address scheme, signature algorithm, transaction witnesses
Obviously it would be a non-trivial amount of work to combine it all so that it flows well, flesh out any corners, and create references. However, I'm pretty sure it's all there
This tweet thread
started a discussion.
It would be nice to have a thorough whitepaper, although currently there are no hands to make it happen, and developers prefer to keep building. Quoting Dave: