As discussed in this chat, Ditto plans to handle the corrections and they have systems in place to detect errors without requesting input from the community.
Still, it may be useful to cooperate with the community's wandering energy:
If there are voluntary, organic reports it may help to detect more errors. To accept them we need a way to submit errors.
For transparency and to avoid duplication it's also useful to see and track all errors as they are detected and processed.
It must be communicated to the users of this issue tracker to not pick correction tasks themselves because they are handled by Ditto
Some ways discussed in the linked chat:
Issues can marked in some way, e.g. with a label or assigned to a person from Ditto
There can be one issue per article to correct, or all articles in one big checklist where comments are used to submit new errors
Alternativey, Ditto can provide a link to their tracking system (e.g. a Trello board)
As discussed in this chat, Ditto plans to handle the corrections and they have systems in place to detect errors without requesting input from the community.
Still, it may be useful to cooperate with the community's wandering energy:
Some ways discussed in the linked chat: