search

decrypto-org / blockchain-papers

A curated list of academic blockchain-related papers
2.44k stars 555 forks source link

Systematic Review Paper added #87

Closed pcakhilnadh closed 5 years ago

pcakhilnadh commented 5 years ago

Checklist for submitting a pull request to blockchain-papers:

pcakhilnadh commented 5 years ago

Direct link to pdf is added but token will get expire and will be redirected to science direct page automatically. People have to click on the download option in the science direct site to access the paper each time if they need to access it. They have developed their website accordingly.

Sorry It is not a mistake from my end and I cannot do anything on this .

The paper is open source and it is a direct link to Science Direct journal. It is a must read paper in blockchain. I highly recommend you add this to your collections

Thanks.

dionyziz commented 5 years ago

Here is a direct link outside of Elsevier's website:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Dasaklis/publication/329136952_A_systematic_literature_review_of_blockchain-based_applications_Current_status_classification_and_open_issues/links/5c4cab1ba6fdccd6b5cb7ea1/A-systematic-literature-review-of-blockchain-based-applications-Current-status-classification-and-open-issues.pdf

Based on their unethical business practices and general immoral existence, we should avoid linking to Elsevier's website until we can ban all their publications altogether.

OrfeasLitos commented 5 years ago

Thanks for your quick reply.

The author list still doesn't follow the format: Authors' first names should be after the last name without a , in between the two and abbreviated to a single letter. No and for the last author.

A space is missing after the author list and before the year. Also better write T&I '18 instead of '18 (Published in Elsevier)

dionyziz commented 5 years ago

The journal name is "Telematics and Informatics". Elsevier is the publisher, which should not appear.

(Besides, we don't want to promote Elsevier.)

OrfeasLitos commented 5 years ago

Last lint and I promise I'll merge after that: Add . at the end, after the year.

OrfeasLitos commented 5 years ago

Thanks for asking. I believe that having a uniform style in this page is good. In principle I don't mind such tiny mistakes. But. If we allow minor discrepancies, new contributors may copy off of these and add theirs on top. It's a matter of weeks until we end up with very inconsistent styles between references.

Sorry for being such a pedant and thanks for the contribution!