Closed ineiti closed 2 years ago
The first PR to implement the IdentityTSM used a (Un)MarshalBinary that was not compatible with the protobuf-encoding we were doing.
This PR contains also some tests used to discover this discrepancy.
Because there is no TSM-identity stored in binary form, this should not break anything.
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
0 Bugs 0 Vulnerabilities 0 Security Hotspots 1 Code Smell
No Coverage information 0.0% Duplication
The first PR to implement the IdentityTSM used a (Un)MarshalBinary that was not compatible with the protobuf-encoding we were doing.
This PR contains also some tests used to discover this discrepancy.
Because there is no TSM-identity stored in binary form, this should not break anything.