Open deejcunningham opened 6 years ago
Running through some utterances today...
First, diversifying natural language utterances: Possible natural language utterances for a LIVE score are:
With the addition of context (a TEAM being implied based on previous interaction), this becomes possible:
Possible natural language utterances for a PAST score are:
[TIME] is an optional parameter that defaults to latest final score, but could be things like "earlier|today", "yesterday" or a day of the week with "last" implied beforehand "last|Wednesday", or even a raw date "June 15th". Will likely start with most commonly asked for times first "earlier|today", "yesterday", and day of week "last|Wednesday". Specific dates seem unlikely to be useful for the vast majority of users.
[OPPONENT] is another optional parameter that would default to the latest game against that opposing team or possibly the result of a series (but that is more in line with a standings intent to be implemented at a later date).
(This comment was edited to remove some team names)
Team names should be updated and diversified. I believe the current STT engine is DeepSpeech which should be capable of handling all of these pronouns. Either way, I have tried to find possible 'nicknames' for MLB teams that a user may use instead of the full name. They should all eventually function equivalently:
Baltimore Orioles
Boston Red Sox
New York Yankees
Tampa Bay Rays
Toronto Blue Jays
Chicago White Sox
Cleveland Indians
Detroit Tigers
Kansas City Royals
Minnesota Twins
Houston Astros
Los Angeles Angels
Oakland Athletics
Seattle Mariners
Texas Rangers
Atlanta Braves
Miami Marlins
New York Mets
Philadelphia Phillies
Washington Nationals
Chicago Cubs
Cincinnati Reds
Milwaukee Brewers
Pittsburgh Pirates
St. Louis Cardinals
Arizona Diamondbacks
Colorado Rockies
Los Angeles Dodgers
San Diego Padres
San Francisco Giants
There are some conflicts. "Sox" for both the Red Sox and White Sox. "Birds" for the Orioles and Cardinals. These will not function until I build in some context so Mycroft can ask for a clarification (and hopefully remember that preference for the future)
Some thoughts on team names:
Doing some voice testing today and ran across the following:
Said "What's the O's score" - asking about the Orioles; Mycroft detects "what's the o's score", falls back on the Wolfram Alpha skill and reports "20 s o'". This also occurs with the "a's" and "m's".
Mycroft fails to detect "Tiges", "'Stros" and "Cubbies" - instead detecting "tigers", "astros" and "cubs". It reports the correct information anyways so not a big deal, but will keep an eye on these three.
Mycroft detects "redbirds" instead of "red birds", so that has been added.
Mycroft sometimes detects "dbacks" (in addition to normally detecting "d-backs") so "dbacks" has been added as well.
When speaking naturally, Mycroft sometimes drops the tailing s - i.e. in "Cards", "Snakes", "Wahoos". This is likely because the next word is usually "score" but maybe I should consider adding singular versions as valid names?
Mycroft detects "rock's" (and sometimes "rockets") instead of "Rox" when asking about the Rockies. Tried to add it as a valid reference, but Mycroft fails to make the skill connection. This (plus the problems with the 'letter' teams) leads me to believe that there is an issue when Mycroft detects the team name as containing an apostrophe (or apostrophe then the letter s). I will have to investigate this more.
Currently only responds to the words "score" and a valid MLB team in the proper format: "D-backs" not "Diamondbacks", "Athletics" not "A's", "Cardinals" not "Cards", etc.
Acceptable utterances should be diversified to include all possible natural language variations for any given intent.