Another implementation (without Java)

[GoogleCodeExporter]

After getting something like 5 samples per second, and Java hogging 1005 of my 
CPU, I decided to create a different solution, it's called lxardoscope, 
available from http://lxardoscope.sourceforge.net/ .
Features:
    - display modes: two channels, time/add/xy
    - vertical: 2mV to 10V per division
    - overall gain control for calibration
    - horizontal: 100us to 5 sec, for full sweep
    - trace position adjustments: vertical and horizontal
    - trigger: on/off, channel 1 or channel2, rising or falling edge
    - trigger level: -10 to +10V
    - signal level measurements: max, min, pp, avg, rms
    - signal levels and time shown for mouse pointer location selected on display 
    - up to 3000 samples per second, per channel
    - option for recording input data stream to file
    - option to display recorded data from file
    - timebase calibration adapts to Arduino's conversion speed
    - GND calibration allows for selecting arbitrary GND potential

Original issue reported on code.google.com by oleuth...@gmail.com on 17 Sep 2011 at 9:20

Attachments:

• lxardoscope.png

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I don't understand. This is an issue?

Original comment by david.ko...@gmail.com on 9 Nov 2011 at 4:05

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by david.ko...@gmail.com on 9 Nov 2011 at 4:06

• Changed state: Invalid

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I was not pleased to see a sampling rate of about 10 samples per second, while 
Java was hogging 100% of my CPU. So I decided to adapt the existing code for 
LXOSCOPE (also available on Sourceforge).
With more than 1000 downloads of the LXARDOSCOPE form Sourceforge, there is 
obviously significant interest in my solution. In the mean time, I have 
uploaded a new version, with many bug fixes and enhancements.
Please check it out and let me know what you think.
Regards
     Nick

Original comment by oleuth...@gmail.com on 12 Dec 2011 at 7:42