deepcharles / ruptures

ruptures: change point detection in Python
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
1.54k stars 160 forks source link

chore: pre-commit autoupdate #288

Closed pre-commit-ci[bot] closed 1 year ago

pre-commit-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago

updates:

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (e0f009f) 98.77% compared to head (093ac4d) 98.77%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #288 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.77% 98.77% ======================================= Files 40 40 Lines 978 978 ======================================= Hits 966 966 Misses 12 12 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `98.77% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/deepcharles/ruptures/pull/288?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/ruptures/detection/binseg.py](https://codecov.io/gh/deepcharles/ruptures/pull/288?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.#diff-c3JjL3J1cHR1cmVzL2RldGVjdGlvbi9iaW5zZWcucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [src/ruptures/detection/kernelcpd.py](https://codecov.io/gh/deepcharles/ruptures/pull/288?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.#diff-c3JjL3J1cHR1cmVzL2RldGVjdGlvbi9rZXJuZWxjcGQucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [src/ruptures/detection/pelt.py](https://codecov.io/gh/deepcharles/ruptures/pull/288?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.#diff-c3JjL3J1cHR1cmVzL2RldGVjdGlvbi9wZWx0LnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [src/ruptures/detection/window.py](https://codecov.io/gh/deepcharles/ruptures/pull/288?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.#diff-c3JjL3J1cHR1cmVzL2RldGVjdGlvbi93aW5kb3cucHk=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Charles+T.)

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

oboulant commented 1 year ago

Seems like black and docformatter have a conflicting behaviour on mkdocs_macros.py:

Solution : I just exclude mkdocs_macros.py from the file to be checked by docformatter.

deepcharles commented 1 year ago

Thanks @oboulant !