Closed davidvonthenen closed 7 months ago
[!WARNING]
Rate Limit Exceeded
@dvonthenen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review.
How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45e3b3bbb5a1bf0d82bfeef329d15500ec8a7219 and d5cd1f5490b698849c148a10f0e9e71ac2ac8887.
The recent update in the Deepgram project focuses on enhancing thread safety and message handling in the Client
class. By incorporating mutexes for subscribing and sending operations, introducing separate methods for binary and text messages, and implementing locking mechanisms for immediate message sending, the changes significantly improve the robustness and efficiency of communication within the Client
class.
File Path | Change Summary |
---|---|
Deepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.cs |
Added mutexes for subscription and sending, introduced distinct methods for binary and text messages, implemented locking for immediate sending. |
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
This implements various different mechanisms for sending data... whether it's in a queue or it's immediately (bypassing the queue) direct with a byte buffer.
Tested using the
Send()
andSendImmedaitely()
using the microphone example. Works just fine.Summary by CodeRabbit