JJ has been running into performance issues with partitioned tables being slower than their non-partitioned counterparts for the same operations (e.g. raj). This points out the need for some partition_by benchmarks. (A version of this was attempted previously but had problems because small data sets may or may not have a value needed for the test in the partition.)
JJ has been running into performance issues with partitioned tables being slower than their non-partitioned counterparts for the same operations (e.g. raj). This points out the need for some
partition_by
benchmarks. (A version of this was attempted previously but had problems because small data sets may or may not have a value needed for the test in the partition.)Related:
Performance is better with partitions:
Performance is worse with partitions:
Suggestiong for S3 parquet partitioned test