Open jjbrosnan opened 12 months ago
We may want the implementation to be a bit more general than ring-to-blink; technically, we could just look at the new adds, ignore removes, and assert there are no modifies / shifts. This more closely matches with how we actually construct ring tables as well.
As a user, I'd like a ring-to-blink table adapter that I can use in my queries. The reverse exists, so it's fitting that this should exist as well.