Open Flying-dragon-boxing opened 5 months ago
Actually, for band structure calculation with hybrid functionals, two sets of kpts are used. This may fit in the K_Vectors well.
@mohanchen This won't be a quick fix and is not needed in current codes. We may close this issue for now and re-open it when necessary.
Background
For a k point, get downsampled q points: $\mathbf{q_k} = \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{b}_1 \dfrac{m_1 C_1}{N_1} + \mathbf{b}_2 \dfrac{m_2 C_2}{N_2} + \mathbf{b}_3 \dfrac{m_3 C_3}{N_3}, (m_i = 0, \cdots, N_i/C_i - 1)$ ($\mathbf{b}_i$ are the reciprocal lattice vectors of the primitive cell, and $C_i$ is the integer grid reduction factor along reciprocal lattice direction $\mathbf{b}_i$)
Reference: https://www.vasp.at/wiki/index.php/Downsampling_of_the_Hartree-Fock_operator https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2187006
Describe the solution you'd like
ik
std::vector<int> iqs
Task list only for developers
Notice Possible Changes of Behavior (Reminder only for developers)
No response
Notice any changes of core modules (Reminder only for developers)
No response
Notice Possible Changes of Core Modules (Reminder only for developers)
No response
Additional Context
I don't really understand much about the M-P sampling and the Gamma Centered sampling process, and I'm curious if the q points got from this method is an exact subset of the k points set. If so, we can use a index
iq
for one q point, and we can easily get the planewaves on q pointiq
. If Interpolation is required, the downsampling seems to be not efficient. I think there is no need to support such downsampling for a manually set k point list. (And this may be hard! )Task list for Issue attackers (only for developers)