Open meishengme opened 3 months ago
There is a clear difference between forces and stresses when using Abacus and QE to calculate structural optimizations. abacus/force qe/force abacus/stress abacus/stress 108_PW_RE 5.171153 0.050307131 801.33330 370.0818556 108_PW_RE_MB 6.582841 0.154674016 109_PW_CR_fix_a 0.058887 0.00147380 348.16950 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_ab 0.083326 0.001473803 352.06580 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_abc 0.000000 0.001473803 350.99000 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_ac 0.083578 0.001473803 352.04620 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_b 0.059004 0.001473803 348.16250 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_bc 0.083429 0.001473803 352.06930 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_c 0.058676 0.001473803 348.18910 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_moveatoms 0.000000 0.001473803 342.18700 149.9037047
No response
There examples are from ABACUS, how did you calculate them using QE, could you provide QE files? Thanks.
Describe the Testing Issue
There is a clear difference between forces and stresses when using Abacus and QE to calculate structural optimizations. abacus/force qe/force abacus/stress abacus/stress 108_PW_RE 5.171153 0.050307131 801.33330 370.0818556 108_PW_RE_MB 6.582841 0.154674016 109_PW_CR_fix_a 0.058887 0.00147380 348.16950 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_ab 0.083326 0.001473803 352.06580 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_abc 0.000000 0.001473803 350.99000 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_ac 0.083578 0.001473803 352.04620 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_b 0.059004 0.001473803 348.16250 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_bc 0.083429 0.001473803 352.06930 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_fix_c 0.058676 0.001473803 348.18910 149.9037047 109_PW_CR_moveatoms 0.000000 0.001473803 342.18700 149.9037047
Additional Context
No response
Task list for Issue attackers (only for developers)