deepmodeling / deepmd-kit

A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics
https://docs.deepmodeling.com/projects/deepmd/
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
1.41k stars 487 forks source link

fix(tf): throw RuntimeError for se_a + type_embedding #3861

Closed njzjz closed 3 weeks ago

njzjz commented 1 month ago

Fix #3541.

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@njzjz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de3b048bd6a943f24fb33c43b60331f7beca1ef5 and 81eaea31eb84221b627e4cc6846ec1aa5bcfae73.

Walkthrough

The primary change involves introducing a new attribute use_tebd in the DescriptorSeA class in deepmd/tf/descriptor/se_a.py. This attribute is initialized in the constructor and set based on specific conditions in the _pass_filter method. Additionally, the serialize method has been updated to handle serialization logic depending on the value of use_tebd. A new assertion using assertRaises for RuntimeError has also been added in the test file test_model_se_a_type.py.

Changes

File Change Summary
deepmd/tf/descriptor/se_a.py Added use_tebd attribute, initialized it in the constructor, set it in _pass_filter, and used it in serialize
source/tests/tf/test_model_se_a_type.py Added a new assertion using assertRaises for RuntimeError in the test_model function

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DescriptorSeA
    participant Serializer

    User->>DescriptorSeA: Create instance
    DescriptorSeA->>DescriptorSeA: Initialize use_tebd

    User->>DescriptorSeA: Call _pass_filter
    DescriptorSeA->>DescriptorSeA: Set use_tebd based on conditions

    User->>DescriptorSeA: Call serialize
    DescriptorSeA->>DescriptorSeA: Check use_tebd
    DescriptorSeA->>Serializer: Serialize based on use_tebd

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Handle type embedding in DescrptSeA.serialize (#3541)
Ensure use_tebd attribute is set and used correctly
Add necessary tests for new functionality

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.67%. Comparing base (c71ece3) to head (81eaea3).

Files Patch % Lines
deepmd/tf/descriptor/se_a.py 83.33% 1 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## devel #3861 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 82.66% 82.67% ======================================= Files 517 517 Lines 49724 49729 +5 Branches 2984 2985 +1 ======================================= + Hits 41106 41111 +5 Misses 7708 7708 Partials 910 910 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.